Unix Technical Forum

BUG #2117: inconsistency in sum

This is a discussion on BUG #2117: inconsistency in sum within the pgsql Bugs forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> The following bug has been logged online: Bug reference: 2117 Logged by: Adam Kolany Email address: dr.a.kolany@wp.pl PostgreSQL version: ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > PostgreSQL > pgsql Bugs

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008, 10:34 AM
Adam Kolany
 
Posts: n/a
Default BUG #2117: inconsistency in sum


The following bug has been logged online:

Bug reference: 2117
Logged by: Adam Kolany
Email address: dr.a.kolany@wp.pl
PostgreSQL version: 8.0.1
Operating system: Linux, SuSe 9.2
Description: inconsistency in sum
Details:

can you explain this?
================================================== ====
stoff=> select sum(wplyw),sum(wydatek), sum(wplyw)-sum(wydatek) from
rachunki where okres<6;
sum | sum | ?column?
-------+---------+----------
73745 | 6712.55 | 67032.5
(1 row)

stoff=>
================================================== ====

in real, the 'sum(wplyw)' should be: 73745,05

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008, 10:34 AM
Michael Fuhr
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: BUG #2117: inconsistency in sum

On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:03:55AM +0000, Adam Kolany wrote:
> can you explain this?
> ================================================== ====
> stoff=> select sum(wplyw),sum(wydatek), sum(wplyw)-sum(wydatek) from
> rachunki where okres<6;
> sum | sum | ?column?
> -------+---------+----------
> 73745 | 6712.55 | 67032.5
> (1 row)


What data types are wplyw and wydatek?

--
Michael Fuhr

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008, 10:34 AM
Tom Lane
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: BUG #2117: inconsistency in sum

"Adam Kolany" <dr.a.kolany@wp.pl> writes:
> can you explain this?
> ================================================== ====
> stoff=> select sum(wplyw),sum(wydatek), sum(wplyw)-sum(wydatek) from
> rachunki where okres<6;
> sum | sum | ?column?
> -------+---------+----------
> 73745 | 6712.55 | 67032.5
> (1 row)


Seems odd, but you haven't provided nearly enough information to let
anyone else reproduce the problem.

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2008, 10:34 AM
Michael Fuhr
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: BUG #2117: inconsistency in sum

[Please copy the mailing list on replies.]

On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 07:32:54PM +0100, Adam Kolany wrote:
> Michael Fuhr napisa?(a):
> >On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 11:03:55AM +0000, Adam Kolany wrote:
> >>stoff=> select sum(wplyw),sum(wydatek), sum(wplyw)-sum(wydatek) from
> >>rachunki where okres<6;
> >> sum | sum | ?column?
> >>-------+---------+----------
> >>73745 | 6712.55 | 67032.5
> >>(1 row)

> >
> >What data types are wplyw and wydatek?
> >

> they were float(2)
>
> casting them into numeric helped, so I have changed the types of the to
> numeric, instead of float(2)
>
> this is however a bug, I think.


float(2) gives you a real, aka float4 (32-bit floating point). As
the documentation points out, that type has a precision of 6 decimal
digits; you seem to object to the rounding:

test=> SELECT 73745::float8 - 6712.55::float8;
?column?
----------
67032.45
(1 row)

test=> SELECT 67032.45::float4;
float4
---------
67032.5
(1 row)

test=> SELECT 73745::float4 - 6712.55::float4;
?column?
----------
67032.5
(1 row)

That's arguably not a bug: you've requested a low-precision data
type so you have to expect discrepancies around that 6th digit of
precision. If you need greater precision then use a double precision
(float8) type, or if you need exact precision (e.g., for handling
money) then use numeric.

--
Michael Fuhr

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com