I'm sorry Tom, you are right.

Atentamente,
Soluciones Integrales GIS C.A (SIGIS)
Christian Gonzalez
christian.gonzalez@sigis.com.ve


-----Mensaje original-----
De: pgsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org [mailtogsql-bugs-owner@postgresql.org]
En nombre de Tom Lane
Enviado el: Miércoles, 18 de Abril de 2007 01:24 p.m.
Para: Christian Gonzalez
CC: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Asunto: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3236: Partitioning has problem with timestamp and
timestamptz data type

"Christian Gonzalez" <christian.gonzalez@sigis.com.ve> writes:
> When you use timestamp and timestamptz data type for partitioning
> implementation, your postgresql partitioning implementation doesen't
> work fine when you make a SELECT using this columns type.

Your example is a bit silly, since you created a table partitioned on
logdate, then added two unrelated columns and expected the system to assume
the table was partitioned on those. I suppose this is a mistake in the
example, but it's not clear what the real complaint is.

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match

--
Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner en busca de virus y otros
contenidos peligrosos, y se considera que está limpio.


--
Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner
en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
y se considera que está limpio.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq