vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| [RESENT MESSAGE - the previous one was presumably held for moderation because of an attachment. If the prior one did in fact make it through and I just didn't get it then sorry for the noise.] Hi all Following my -general post about this issue I'm supplying a test case for a query that fails with a 'Too many LWLocks held' error. The test data, system configuration details, etc are in the tarball that you can obtain here: http://www.postnewspapers.com.au/~cr...k_test.tar.bz2 The README in the package provides all the detail I can think of, but here's the summary again: ------ This is a test case for a `Too many LWLocks held' error encountered when using pg_trgm with a GIN index in the following query: SELECT a.message, b.message FROM po_message a, po_message b WHERE a.id <> b.id AND a.message % b.message; The error does not occur if a GIST index is present on `po_message.message' instead of a GIST index, or if no index is present at all. It only arises when the % operator is used. ------ -- Craig Ringer -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs |
| ||||
| > Following my -general post about this issue I'm supplying a test case > for a query that fails with a 'Too many LWLocks held' error. Thank you, I reproduced the bug and now I'm working on it. -- Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/ -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |