vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hello, I'm using solaris 8 on sun blade 500 machines. I am not the administrator. I browsed to through the directory subtree in which gcc resides and found lots of info files. On cygwin, I can use the info command, but not on solaris. I did some web searching and found that "info" is gnu specific. On our system, the alternative is use the man pages, but I don't find them very explanatory. I searched for an info package at www.sunfreeware.com, in hopes of asking the administrator to install it. But it doesn't exist there. I went to the gcc homepage http://gcc.gnu.org, but they don't have the online manual for our version (3.2.1). Isn't it kind of odd that they have online manuals for older and newer versions, but not 3.2.1? Anyway, is there a way to access the manual (not the man pages) for gcc 3.2.1? Thanks. Fred -- Fred Ma Dept. of Electronics, Carleton University 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario Canada, K1S 5B6 |
| |||
| Fred Ma <fma@doe.carleton.ca> writes: >I searched for an info package at www.sunfreeware.com, >in hopes of asking the administrator to install it. >But it doesn't exist there. I went to the gcc homepage It is possibly called "texinfo". |
| |||
| Neil W Rickert wrote: > > Fred Ma <fma@doe.carleton.ca> writes: > > >I searched for an info package at www.sunfreeware.com, > >in hopes of asking the administrator to install it. > >But it doesn't exist there. I went to the gcc homepage > > It is possibly called "texinfo". I tried it, but it's not recognized. I also tried "man -k texinfo", again without any hits. My MANPATH is /home/fma/INSTROOT/man:/usr/share/man:/usr/man/man:/usr/man:/usr/local/man:/opt/dt/man:/usr/openwin/man:/opt/x11/current/man:/usr/local/X11R5/man:/usr/perl5/man:/opt/utils/ddd/man:/opt/gdb/man:/CMC/tools/synopsys/sim/doc/sim/man:/CMC/tools/synopsys/sim/doc/cy/man Thanks anyway. Fred -- Fred Ma Dept. of Electronics, Carleton University 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario Canada, K1S 5B6 |
| |||
| Fred Ma wrote: > I'm using solaris 8 on sun blade 500 machines. > I am not the administrator. I browsed to through > the directory subtree in which gcc resides and > found lots of info files. In a pinch, you can just do "more" or "less" or "view" on them. They are just text files. Yeah, they have an occasional control character, but it has never been enough to throw off any text viewer program I've used. You won't get the hyperlinks and stuff this way, but you will get the information. By the way, it works best to do something like "cat gcc.info* | less" so that you can view them all at once, since you don't have the ability to jump between files, and info files rely heavily on that ability. If you want them in proper numerical order, you can do a "ls -1 gcc.info* | sort -t- +1n | xargs cat | less". - Logan |
| |||
| In article <400A0868.B31DBE09@doe.carleton.ca>, Fred Ma wrote: > Anyway, is there a way to access the manual (not the > man pages) for gcc 3.2.1? Thanks. The source of these manuals is in texinfo. It can be processed by TeX, giving results that can printed or previewed. Alternatively, it can be converted into info files which were originally intended for emacs. The info command is just a tool to access info files outside of emacs. So if you have emacs installed but are just missing info, you should attempt to access the gcc info files with emacs. Note that emacs is shipped with Solaris on the ``Software Companion'' CD. Alternatively, you can attempt to google for it as there are many info (or texinfo) to html cgi scripts on the web around. Andreas. -- Dr. Andreas F. Borchert, SAI, Universitaet Ulm | One should make everything Helmholtzstrasse 18, E02, Tel +49 731 50-23572 | as simple as possible, but http://www.mathematik.uni-ulm.de/sai/borchert/ | no simpler. -- A. Einstein |
| |||
| Fred Ma <fma@doe.carleton.ca> writes: > On cygwin, I can use the info command, but not on solaris. If you have emacs installed on Solaris, emacs can browse and display info files. -- Maurizio Loreti http://www.pd.infn.it/~loreti/mlo.html Dept. of Physics, Univ. of Padova, Italy ROT13: ybergv@cq.vasa.vg |
| |||
| Fred Ma <fma@doe.carleton.ca> writes in comp.unix.solaris: |I searched for an info package at www.sunfreeware.com, |in hopes of asking the administrator to install it. |But it doesn't exist there. Yes it does - the "info" command is part of the "texinfo" package, which is available from the Sun Companion CD, sunfreeware.com, and most other freeware sites. -- __________________________________________________ ______________________ Alan Coopersmith alanc@alum.calberkeley.org http://www.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU/~alanc/ aka: Alan.Coopersmith@Sun.COM Working for, but definitely not speaking for, Sun Microsystems, Inc. |
| |||
| In article <bueh9u$1r49$2@agate.berkeley.edu>, Alan Coopersmith <alanc@alum.calberkeley.org> wrote: >Fred Ma <fma@doe.carleton.ca> writes in comp.unix.solaris: >|I searched for an info package at www.sunfreeware.com, >|in hopes of asking the administrator to install it. >|But it doesn't exist there. > >Yes it does - the "info" command is part of the "texinfo" package, >which is available from the Sun Companion CD, sunfreeware.com, and >most other freeware sites. While I would brefer that FSF would move towards the standard 'man' format which is part of the POSIX standard, the problem is that Sun is installing 'info' to a place where nobody looks for it: /usr/sfw/bin/info -- EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) If you don't have iso-8859-1 schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) chars I am J"org Schilling URL: http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/usr/schilling ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily |
| |||
| Joerg Schilling wrote: > > In article <bueh9u$1r49$2@agate.berkeley.edu>, > Alan Coopersmith <alanc@alum.calberkeley.org> wrote: > >Fred Ma <fma@doe.carleton.ca> writes in comp.unix.solaris: > >|I searched for an info package at www.sunfreeware.com, > >|in hopes of asking the administrator to install it. > >|But it doesn't exist there. > > > >Yes it does - the "info" command is part of the "texinfo" package, > >which is available from the Sun Companion CD, sunfreeware.com, and > >most other freeware sites. > > While I would brefer that FSF would move towards the standard 'man' > format which is part of the POSIX standard, the problem is that > Sun is installing 'info' to a place where nobody looks for it: > > /usr/sfw/bin/info Thanks for all your suggestions: using "less", using "emacs", converting to html, and the location of texinfo at www.sunfreeware.com. Since gcc and its documentation set is big and complicated, I think the hyperlinking is important. I tried emacs, but having used vi[m] for as long as I can remember, it's a little difficult. Also, I'm getting caught into the trap of spending lots of time getting to know tools, rather than actual algorithm development e.g. just getting to know info, vim's taglist, source-navigator, etc., etc.. So I'm going to shy away from learning another app now (especially since I already spent the time with info), but more than likely, I will do so in the future. That's just a long winded apology for not spending more time to learn emacs right now (but the reasons are truthful). I'll ask my system administrator to install texinfo when he has a moemnt. Thanks again. Fred P.S. Isn't info more powerful than man? We don't have hyperlinks in man pages. Whenever I see an underlined reference, I have no idea where to start looking for it. -- Fred Ma Dept. of Electronics, Carleton University 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario Canada, K1S 5B6 |
| ||||
| At 19 Jan 2004 00:36:09 GMT, js@cs.tu-berlin.de (Joerg Schilling) writes: > While I would brefer that FSF would move towards the standard 'man' > format which is part of the POSIX standard, Hmm, where is 'man' format specified by POSIX? POSIX specifies an extremely minimal form of the 'man' command (and this only for systems that support the User Portability Utilities option), but I don't see where it specifies 'man' format. Or perhaps you're referring to the textual format of the POSIX standard itself? In that case, I'd say that it's not appropriate for all forms of documentation; certainly not for GCC. |