Unix Technical Forum

Sol10 and kmdb on Blade 2000.

This is a discussion on Sol10 and kmdb on Blade 2000. within the comp.unix.solaris forums, part of the Solaris Operating System category; --> I had another crash/hang, and decided to boot kmdb. I'd put up with the performance loss for whatever length ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Solaris Operating System > comp.unix.solaris

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2008, 05:01 AM
hume.spamfilter@bofh.ca
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sol10 and kmdb on Blade 2000.

I had another crash/hang, and decided to boot kmdb. I'd put up with the
performance loss for whatever length of time it took if it meant finding the
problem.

However, trying to "boot -k" got me this:

Rebooting with command: boot -k
Boot device: /pci@8,600000/SUNW,qlc@4/fp@0,0/disk@w21000020375c0519,0:a File and args: -k
Loading kmdb...
SunOS Release 5.10 Version Generic_127111-01 64-bit
Copyright 1983-2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
boot: failed to allocate 16384 bytes from scratch memory
panic - boot: boot: scratch memory overflow.

Program terminated
{0} ok


.... which isn't what I expected.

I think I'm going to give up on ZFS on this machine and go back to UFS,
which is a bit of a pain. But it's the only way I can think of to eliminate
ZFS as the cause... unless someone can suggest something.

--
Brandon Hume - hume -> BOFH.Ca, http://WWW.BOFH.Ca/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2008, 05:01 AM
hume.spamfilter@bofh.ca
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sol10 and kmdb on Blade 2000.

hume.spamfilter@bofh.ca wrote:
> I think I'm going to give up on ZFS on this machine and go back to UFS,
> which is a bit of a pain. But it's the only way I can think of to eliminate
> ZFS as the cause... unless someone can suggest something.


Well, it crashed, just using UFS. Odd that I could get the filesystem
unmounted, but prtvtoc on the disk hung... as did every other process
which tried to open up a file. Then powering off the firewire enclosure
panicked the machine. I was hoping just for some resets/EXIO errors.

Oh well. ZFS not to blame. Now I just have to shop for some disks for
this thing.

And throw the enclosure at someone I don't like.

--
Brandon Hume - hume -> BOFH.Ca, http://WWW.BOFH.Ca/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2008, 05:01 AM
Dave
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sol10 and kmdb on Blade 2000.

hume.spamfilter@bofh.ca wrote:

> Oh well. ZFS not to blame. Now I just have to shop for some disks for
> this thing.
>
> And throw the enclosure at someone I don't like.
>


As a matter of interst, what make/model are they? I know what to avoid
then, as I too have the same machine.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2008, 05:01 AM
hume.spamfilter@bofh.ca
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sol10 and kmdb on Blade 2000.

Dave <nowhere@nowhere.com> wrote:
> As a matter of interst, what make/model are they? I know what to avoid
> then, as I too have the same machine.


It's a Western Digital 160G ATA100 disk in a Vantec NexStar FW400 enclosure.
I was warned by a friend (much too late, of course) that they tend to get
quite warm; although this case never seemed to get hot, and rarely failed
during high activity, only idling.

I'll be trolling around eBay for some 73G internal disks, since I'd like
to upgrade (and mirror) the root disk. They seem to be going for about
$125 CAD in some instances. I can probably choke that down.

--
Brandon Hume - hume -> BOFH.Ca, http://WWW.BOFH.Ca/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2008, 05:01 AM
Bill Waddington
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sol10 and kmdb on Blade 2000.

On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 20:49:04 +0000 (UTC), hume.spamfilter@bofh.ca
wrote:

>Dave <nowhere@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> As a matter of interst, what make/model are they? I know what to avoid
>> then, as I too have the same machine.

>
>It's a Western Digital 160G ATA100 disk in a Vantec NexStar FW400 enclosure.
>I was warned by a friend (much too late, of course) that they tend to get
>quite warm; although this case never seemed to get hot, and rarely failed
>during high activity, only idling.


FWIW (as you probably already know) there are external enclosures
w/fans available. I use an AMS Venus (USB) model that has a nice big
- and quiet - fan. Not a lot of experience with it but it works and
seems to stay fairly cool. My friends at NewEgg stock it and others:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16817145656

A neighbor who does a lot of work w/external drives wouldn't use
any exclosure that didn't have a fan.

Just sticking my beak in...
Bill
--
William D Waddington
william.waddington@beezmo.com
"Even bugs...are unexpected signposts on
the long road of creativity..." - Ken Burtch
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com