Unix Technical Forum

Solaris9 vs. Solaris9 9/04

This is a discussion on Solaris9 vs. Solaris9 9/04 within the comp.unix.solaris forums, part of the Solaris Operating System category; --> I have an installation of a Solaris9 release that is earlier than Solaris9 9/04. It is not even Solaris9 ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Solaris Operating System > comp.unix.solaris

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-06-2008, 07:12 PM
noone
 
Posts: n/a
Default Solaris9 vs. Solaris9 9/04


I have an installation of a Solaris9 release that is earlier than Solaris9
9/04. It is not even Solaris9 9/02, based on /etc/release.

My question is, isn't any release of Solaris9 really just Solaris9 plus
all the cluster patches ?

For example, docs.sun.com says that Solaris9 4/03 has "Multiterabyte
support for Solaris Volume Manager" as a new feature. Do I get this
feature by simply installing the latest cluster patches ?

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-06-2008, 07:12 PM
Matt
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Solaris9 vs. Solaris9 9/04

noone wrote:

>
> I have an installation of a Solaris9 release that is earlier than Solaris9
> 9/04. It is not even Solaris9 9/02, based on /etc/release.
>
> My question is, isn't any release of Solaris9 really just Solaris9 plus
> all the cluster patches ?
>
> For example, docs.sun.com says that Solaris9 4/03 has "Multiterabyte
> support for Solaris Volume Manager" as a new feature. Do I get this
> feature by simply installing the latest cluster patches ?


Cluster patches are only maintainance. Equivilant of an IRIX Maintainance
release.

Relating to Solaris 9, why not install Solaris 10? its a free download!

Matt
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-06-2008, 07:12 PM
Casper H.S. Dik
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Solaris9 vs. Solaris9 9/04

noone <noone@noone.org> writes:


>I have an installation of a Solaris9 release that is earlier than Solaris9
>9/04. It is not even Solaris9 9/02, based on /etc/release.


>My question is, isn't any release of Solaris9 really just Solaris9 plus
>all the cluster patches ?


No; the updates include new packages which aren't installed
by patches.

>For example, docs.sun.com says that Solaris9 4/03 has "Multiterabyte
>support for Solaris Volume Manager" as a new feature. Do I get this
>feature by simply installing the latest cluster patches ?


Possibly.

Casper

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-06-2008, 07:13 PM
noone
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Solaris9 vs. Solaris9 9/04

Casper H.S. Dik wrote:
> noone <noone@noone.org> writes:
>
>>For example, docs.sun.com says that Solaris9 4/03 has "Multiterabyte
>>support for Solaris Volume Manager" as a new feature. Do I get this
>>feature by simply installing the latest cluster patches ?

>
>
> Possibly.
>
> Casper
>


Answering my own question.

The main patch to achieve multiterabyte support is patch 114131-02. The
README then mentions other patches to achieve full multi-TB support.


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-06-2008, 07:13 PM
noone
 
Posts: n/a
Default Multi-terabyte supprot ( was Re: Solaris9 vs. Solaris9 9/04 )

noone wrote:
> Casper H.S. Dik wrote:
>
>> noone <noone@noone.org> writes:
>>
>>> For example, docs.sun.com says that Solaris9 4/03 has "Multiterabyte
>>> support for Solaris Volume Manager" as a new feature. Do I get this
>>> feature by simply installing the latest cluster patches ?

>>
>>
>>
>> Possibly.
>>
>> Casper
>>

>
> Answering my own question.
>
> The main patch to achieve multiterabyte support is patch 114131-02. The
> README then mentions other patches to achieve full multi-TB support.
>
>


Funnily enough, Sun support said that I MUST install 9 4/03 to get
multiterabyte support, despite what the patch README says


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-06-2008, 07:14 PM
Rich Teer
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Solaris9 vs. Solaris9 9/04

On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, noone wrote:

> For example, docs.sun.com says that Solaris9 4/03 has "Multiterabyte
> support for Solaris Volume Manager" as a new feature. Do I get this
> feature by simply installing the latest cluster patches ?


Not likely. As a rule, new features aren't added via patches, although
there are some exceptions.

--
Rich Teer, SCNA, SCSA, author of "Solaris Systems Programming"

President,
Rite Online Inc.

Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-06-2008, 07:15 PM
noone
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Solaris9 vs. Solaris9 9/04

Rich Teer wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, noone wrote:
>
>
>>For example, docs.sun.com says that Solaris9 4/03 has "Multiterabyte
>>support for Solaris Volume Manager" as a new feature. Do I get this
>>feature by simply installing the latest cluster patches ?

>
>
> Not likely. As a rule, new features aren't added via patches, although
> there are some exceptions.
>


In this case, the Multiterabyt feature is actually available via a group
of patches. Possibly starting with patch 114131-02 and then the other
patches indicated in the README file
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-06-2008, 07:17 PM
noone
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Solaris9 vs. Solaris9 9/04

Matt wrote:
>
> Relating to Solaris 9, why not install Solaris 10? its a free download!
>
> Matt


Because what I intend to run on it is not yet certified for Solaris10,
only Solaris9 at this point.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com