This is a discussion on What would happen if i entry only host name in .rhosts file? within the comp.unix.solaris forums, part of the Solaris Operating System category; --> Hi, What would happen if i write a host name (not any user) in .rhosts file? Does all the ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hi, What would happen if i write a host name (not any user) in .rhosts file? Does all the user get access to my system from that host or only root from that system gets the access to my system? Thanks |
| |||
| script4geek <script4geek@gmail.com> writes: >What would happen if i write a host name (not any user) in .rhosts >file? Does all the user get access to my system from that host or only >root from that system gets the access to my system? Just the hostname equals to granting access to the user with the same name on the remote host (so root for /.rhosts and user for ~user/.rhosts) So just a list of hostnames is just "fine" (except that you really ought to be using ssh) Casper -- Expressed in this posting are my opinions. They are in no way related to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems. Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may be fiction rather than truth. |
| ||||
| Casper H.S. Dik <Casper.Dik@sun.com> wrote: > (except that you really ought to be using ssh) mostly yes, but the ssh documentation ist not complete e.g. for cases like: I have to copy lots of data to another host, and i want the login encrypted, but I do not want the volume data encrypted (like for backup and restore). Regards Andreas |