pgsql: If we're going to have a non-panic check for held

pgsql: If we're going to have a non-panic check for held_lwlocks[]

This is a discussion on pgsql: If we're going to have a non-panic check for held_lwlocks[] within the pgsql Committers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Log Message: ----------- If we're going to have a non-panic check for held_lwlocks[] overrun, it must occur *before* we ...

		Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > PostgreSQL > pgsql Committers
pgsql: If we're going to have a non-panic check for held_lwlocks[]

#1 (permalink)

04-10-2008, 11:47 AM

Tom Lane

Posts: n/a

pgsql: If we're going to have a non-panic check for held_lwlocks[]

Log Message:
-----------
If we're going to have a non-panic check for held_lwlocks[] overrun,
it must occur *before* we get into the critical state of holding a
lock we have no place to record. Per discussion with Qingqing Zhou.

Modified Files:
--------------
pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr:
lwlock.c (r1.26 -> r1.27)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsw...1=1.26&r2=1.27)

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend

« pginstaller - pginst: Prep for 8.0.2 | pgaccess - pgaccess: latest version from Robert Strong, with licensing »

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts vB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:46 PM.