This is a discussion on Fate of pgsnmpd within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Hi Does anyone know if pgsnmpd is still actively developed? The last version (0.1b1) is about 15 months old. ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hi Does anyone know if pgsnmpd is still actively developed? The last version (0.1b1) is about 15 months old. greetings, Florian Pflug ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings |
| |||
| Florian G. Pflug wrote: > Hi > > Does anyone know if pgsnmpd is still actively developed? > The last version (0.1b1) is about 15 months old. there seems to be quite a lot of work going on in the cvs tree: http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvs...snmpd/pgsnmpd/ so i would guess it is still active though without an release for a while. Stefan ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend |
| ||||
| Florian G. Pflug wrote: > Hi > > Does anyone know if pgsnmpd is still actively developed? > The last version (0.1b1) is about 15 months old. It is. There is a team (Josh Tolley, me and Hiroshi Saito) working for RFC 1697 compliance. When that's done, there are some other additions in the pipeline. There's been a rewrite of several things since 0.1b1, and what we have now is not ready for production use. But it will be :-) //Magnus ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|