This is a discussion on [FEATURE REQUEST] Streaming Onlinebackup (Maybe OFFTOPIC) within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> It seems there is already a project on pgfoundry but there are no files: http://pgfoundry.org/projects/clearxlogtail/ Should this be on ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| It seems there is already a project on pgfoundry but there are no files: http://pgfoundry.org/projects/clearxlogtail/ Should this be on pgfoundry or in the Postgres distribution. It seems it might be tied enough to the WAL format to be in the Postgres distribution. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kevin Grittner wrote: > >>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2007 at 7:31 PM, in message > <46E055A7.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov>, "Kevin Grittner" > <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> wrote: > >>>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2007 at 7:03 PM, in message > > <1189123422.9243.29.camel@dogma.ljc.laika.com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> I think ... there's still room for a simple tool that can zero out > >> the meaningless data in a partially-used WAL segment before compression. > >> It seems reasonable to me, so long as you keep archive_timeout at > >> something reasonably high. > >> > >> If nothing else, people that already have a collection of archived WAL > >> segments would then be able to compact them. > > > > That would be a *very* useful tool for us, particularly if it could work > > against our existing collection of old WAL files. > > Management here has decided that it would be such a useful tool for our > organization that, if nobody else is working on it yet, it is something I > should be working on this week. Obviously, I would much prefer to do it > in a way which would be useful to the rest of the PostgreSQL community, > so I'm looking for advice, direction, and suggestions before I get started. > > I was planning on a stand-alone executable which could be run against a > list of files to update them in-place, or to handle as single file as a > stream. The former would be useful for dealing with the accumulation of > files we've already got, the latter would be used in our archive script, > just ahead of gzip in the pipe. > > Any suggestions on an existing executable to use as a model for "best > practices" are welcome, as are suggestions for the safest and most robust > techniques for identifying the portion of the WAL file which should be set > to zero. > > Finally, I assume that I should put this on pgfoundry? > > -Kevin > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers |
| |||
| "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes: > Attached is a version as good as I know how to get it. > It works for us, so barring any problems as we use it, I'm done. I finally got around to looking at this. Neither <err.h> nor err() are portable (they're not in the Single Unix Spec, and they don't work here...). The intent seems moderately clear, but please replace those calls with something portable. Otherwise, I think the only thing standing in the way of committing this as a contrib module is that we'll need some user-facing documentation, preferably in the form of an SGML file. (We'd also need a Makefile of course, but that's pretty dang trivial. See pg_standby's files if you need a sample to work from.) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers |
| ||||
| On Sun, Sep 9, 2007 at 4:16 AM, apoc9009 <apoc9009@yahoo.de> wrote: > > No! Actually I'm wearing my tin hat right now and I Never say Anything > > about My Suspicions about 9/11 on Internet in fear of Echelon catching > > and filing me. > > > > --------------- > > Hannu > > > hmm, a little bit Para? > > http://www.myvideo.de/watch/1776449 > > Ok, now your point of View its more clearly... This is a total aside.... Seriously... the kid in the vid has _issues_!!! Is it the OP himself? I'd love to see the subtitled edition of this, or if someone can translate it!!! Best regards, -- gurjeet[.singh]@EnterpriseDB.com EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | hotmail | indiatimes | yahoo }.com Mail sent from my BlackLaptop device |