This is a discussion on Hmmm 8.1 pg_dumpall cannot dump older db's? within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> I can't seem to dump old db's: -bash-2.05b$ pg_dumpall -s -h database-dev > dump.sql Password: pg_dumpall: could not connect ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I can't seem to dump old db's: -bash-2.05b$ pg_dumpall -s -h database-dev > dump.sql Password: pg_dumpall: could not connect to database "postgres": FATAL: database "postgres" does not exist Seems that it is expecting the new 'postgres' database to exist on old installations? Chris ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org |
| |||
| Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes: > Seems that it is expecting the new 'postgres' database to exist on old > installations? Ooops :-( Seems like maybe we want it to try postgres and then fall back to trying template1? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org |
| |||
| >>Seems that it is expecting the new 'postgres' database to exist on old >>installations? > > Ooops :-( Seems like maybe we want it to try postgres and then fall > back to trying template1? Actually, also ONLY assume postgres is a special database if the backend is 8.1 or higher. We don't want to mess with poor people who have already created a database called 'postgres' in their installation of 7.4, say... Chris ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster |
| |||
| >>Seems that it is expecting the new 'postgres' database to exist on old >>installations? > > Ooops :-( Seems like maybe we want it to try postgres and then fall > back to trying template1? No idea particularly well... Chris ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match |
| |||
| Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes: >> Ooops :-( Seems like maybe we want it to try postgres and then fall >> back to trying template1? > Actually, also ONLY assume postgres is a special database if the backend > is 8.1 or higher. We don't want to mess with poor people who have > already created a database called 'postgres' in their installation of > 7.4, say... No, because it's special anyway where the dump will be reloaded. Keep in mind that the design assumption for pg_dump(all) is always that the destination database will be current release or higher; frequently the dump file won't even be parseable by older servers. The thing that makes this slightly painful is that we can't tell what version we are dumping *from* until we've connected, and so we cannot automagically "do the right thing" here. I don't really see any other way to do it than the try-and-fallback approach. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend |
| |||
| On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 23:44:44 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > The thing that makes this slightly painful is that we can't tell what > version we are dumping *from* until we've connected, and so we cannot > automagically "do the right thing" here. I don't really see any other > way to do it than the try-and-fallback approach. But after falling back to template1, a version check could be made and if running 8.1 or higher an error message could be displayed. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq |
| |||
| Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to> writes: > But after falling back to template1, a version check could be made and > if running 8.1 or higher an error message could be displayed. Once we're connected to template1, we might as well just use it ... regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq |
| ||||
| Tom Lane wrote: >Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to> writes: > > >>But after falling back to template1, a version check could be made and >>if running 8.1 or higher an error message could be displayed. >> >> > >Once we're connected to template1, we might as well just use it ... > > > > Agreed. In any case, I thought that dropping the postgres database was supposed to be OK if you wanted to work that way. (I also thought fallback was the way all this was supposed to work anyway). cheers andrew ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match |