This is a discussion on Move the developers wiki? within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Hackers, As you may have noticed ( http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql...3/msg00470.php ) we now have a wiki at wiki.postgresql.org that is replacing ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hackers, As you may have noticed (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql...3/msg00470.php) we now have a wiki at wiki.postgresql.org that is replacing techdocs which unfortunately never worked quite as we had hoped in it's current form. It has been suggested by members of the web team that as the new site has been setup on a dedicated VM and has been properly integrated with the rest of our online infrastructure (unlike the current developer wiki which is basically a quick 'n' dirty install on an already over-utilised VM), that we should consider moving the developer wiki into a dedicated area on it. Any thoughts on whether thats a good or bad idea? Any objections? -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers |
| |||
| On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:25:53AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:16:33 +0000 > "Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote: > > > Hackers, > > > > As you may have noticed > > (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql...3/msg00470.php) we > > now have a wiki at wiki.postgresql.org that is replacing techdocs > > which unfortunately never worked quite as we had hoped in it's current > > form. > > > > It has been suggested by members of the web team that as the new site > > has been setup on a dedicated VM and has been properly integrated with > > the rest of our online infrastructure (unlike the current developer > > wiki which is basically a quick 'n' dirty install on an already > > over-utilised VM), that we should consider moving the developer wiki > > into a dedicated area on it. > > > > Any thoughts on whether thats a good or bad idea? Any objections? > > Not an objection but an observation. The developer wiki seems to be a > catchall for contributors to put various stuff on. There is patch > status, advocacy policies, release policies etc... > > Based on your description of wiki.postgresql.org it is supposed to be > a replacement for techdocs. > > To me, they have different purposes. Well, we could just add a link to a subsection that does those things, no? //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers |
| |||
| Dave, > Any thoughts on whether thats a good or bad idea? Any objections? Well, other than not breaking developer.postgresql.org links, sounds fine to me. -- --Josh Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers |
| |||
| Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > It has been suggested by members of the web team that as the new site > > has been setup on a dedicated VM and has been properly integrated with > > the rest of our online infrastructure (unlike the current developer > > wiki which is basically a quick 'n' dirty install on an already > > over-utilised VM), that we should consider moving the developer wiki > > into a dedicated area on it. > > Not an objection but an observation. The developer wiki seems to be a > catchall for contributors to put various stuff on. There is patch > status, advocacy policies, release policies etc... The developer's wiki was the developer's wiki until other people noticed that they had no wiki so they started using the developer's wiki as a catchall place ("hey, we advocates have nowhere to wiki on; can we use devel's wiki?"). Now that we have a real wiki it makes sense to create separate areas on it for each team. That said, we have links to the developer wiki all over the web. So +1 on moving the developer's wiki to the other one -- but only if the original URLs continue to work (redirecting to the new site). -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers |
| |||
| Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Like I said just observation. I like things compartmentalized but there > is also certainly an argument for redundant resources etc... Are you saying that you want to keep postgresqldocs.org around? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers |
| |||
| On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > That said, we have links to the developer wiki all over the web. > So +1 on moving the developer's wiki to the other one -- but only if the > original URLs continue to work (redirecting to the new site). While the default URL formatting on the new wiki is different, it still supports the same one used on the developer's wiki. You can hit the front page with http://wiki.postgresql.org/index.php/Main_Page same way the URL for the front of the developer's wiki is http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Main_Page If all the pages get moved over with the same names (which doesn't seem like it would be a problem), just changing developer.postgresql.org to point to wiki.postgresql would seem to be sufficient to keep any existing links working. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers |
| |||
| On Wed, 12 Mar 2008, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Are you saying that you want to keep postgresqldocs.org around? One thing at a time. The new PG wiki looks great, seems like the next task is to consider merging the developer's content into there. I was hoping to propose a plan for merging work done on postgresqldocs.org into the new infrastructure in a couple of days, after things settle down a bit. -- * Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers |
| |||
| Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> writes: > If all the pages get moved over with the same names (which doesn't seem > like it would be a problem), just changing developer.postgresql.org to > point to wiki.postgresql would seem to be sufficient to keep any existing > links working. That's not exactly what I'd call "keeping existing links working". regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers |
| |||
| Dave Page wrote: > As you may have noticed > (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql...3/msg00470.php) we > now have a wiki at wiki.postgresql.org that is replacing techdocs Victory! > It has been suggested by members of the web team that as the new site > has been setup on a dedicated VM and has been properly integrated with > the rest of our online infrastructure (unlike the current developer > wiki which is basically a quick 'n' dirty install on an already > over-utilised VM), that we should consider moving the developer wiki > into a dedicated area on it. Yes, please. One wiki should be enough. A bit of accidental crossover between users, developers, and other groups could even be of advantage. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers |
| ||||
| "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> That's not exactly what I'd call "keeping existing links working". > It is if we point developer. to wiki. Will that break anything else (ie, is that webserver serving anything but the wiki)? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|