Hi Magnus.

configure was changed the cvs head.
Is this what you intended it?_?

I think necessary to recover it.

*** configure.orig Tue Apr 3 17:51:06 2007
--- configure Tue Apr 3 17:52:21 2007
***************
*** 16732,16739 ****
# For each platform, we need to know about any special compile and link
# libraries, and whether the normal C function names are thread-safe.
# See the comment at the top of src/port/thread.c for more information.
! # WIN32 doesn't need the pthread tests; it always uses threads
! if test "$enable_thread_safety" = yes -a "$PORTNAME" != "win32"; then


--- 16732,16738 ----
# For each platform, we need to know about any special compile and link
# libraries, and whether the normal C function names are thread-safe.
# See the comment at the top of src/port/thread.c for more information.
! if test "$enable_thread_safety" = yes; then

Am I misunderstanding it?

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:06:16PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> Hi Magnus.
>
> configure was changed the cvs head.
> Is this what you intended it?_?
>
> I think necessary to recover it.
>
> *** configure.orig Tue Apr 3 17:51:06 2007
> --- configure Tue Apr 3 17:52:21 2007
> ***************
> *** 16732,16739 ****
> # For each platform, we need to know about any special compile and link
> # libraries, and whether the normal C function names are thread-safe.
> # See the comment at the top of src/port/thread.c for more information.
> ! # WIN32 doesn't need the pthread tests; it always uses threads
> ! if test "$enable_thread_safety" = yes -a "$PORTNAME" != "win32"; then
>
>
> --- 16732,16738 ----
> # For each platform, we need to know about any special compile and link
> # libraries, and whether the normal C function names are thread-safe.
> # See the comment at the top of src/port/thread.c for more information.
> ! if test "$enable_thread_safety" = yes; then
>
> Am I misunderstanding it?

That is intended. With the changes that was put in to ecpg, pthreads is no
longer required. We use the native threading on Windows instead.

Also, enable_thread_safety is now the default for windows :-)

//Magnus


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at

http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

Hi.

>> Am I misunderstanding it?
>
> That is intended. With the changes that was put in to ecpg, pthreads is no
> longer required. We use the native threading on Windows instead.
>
> Also, enable_thread_safety is now the default for windows :-)

Ooops, Isn't pthreadGC2 necessary?
Slony-I is still used...Ahh, I have not confirmed it yet.
I was too busy and did not catch up with you....
I start the work at once. Thanks!

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match

On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:16:26PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> Hi.
>
> >>Am I misunderstanding it?
> >
> >That is intended. With the changes that was put in to ecpg, pthreads is no
> >longer required. We use the native threading on Windows instead.
> >
> >Also, enable_thread_safety is now the default for windows :-)
>
> Ooops, Isn't pthreadGC2 necessary?

Not any more.

> Slony-I is still used...Ahh, I have not confirmed it yet.

Slony uses it, yes. It would probably be worthwhile to fix that one as
well, but I haven't looked at how much work that would be.

//Magnus


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:16:26PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
>> Slony-I is still used...Ahh, I have not confirmed it yet.
>
> Slony uses it, yes. It would probably be worthwhile to fix that one as
> well, but I haven't looked at how much work that would be.

And to port the build system to msbuild...

:-)

/D

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

From: "Dave Page" <dpage@postgresql.org>

> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:16:26PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
>>> Slony-I is still used...Ahh, I have not confirmed it yet.
>>
>> Slony uses it, yes. It would probably be worthwhile to fix that one as
>> well, but I haven't looked at how much work that would be.
>
> And to port the build system to msbuild...
>
> :-)

Ugaa, Probably, I expected for fear of it. :-)
Furthermore, PostGIS is required. For the time being, it is necessary
to fight with the nightmare. I was able to give good environment.
It will be desired. surely :-)

Regards,
Hiroshi Saito


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org