This is a discussion on Question about 8-byte datatypes within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Is int8 a passed-by-value data type on 64-bit platforms? How do we arrange for that to be the case? ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Is int8 a passed-by-value data type on 64-bit platforms? How do we arrange for that to be the case? I don't see any magic in pg_type.h but I'm not sure what I'm looking for. I'm asking because I have another 8-byte data type I want to use and it would be nice to have that same property, assuming we have it for int8. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org |
| ||||
| On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 11:16:06AM +0100, Gregory Stark wrote: > > Is int8 a passed-by-value data type on 64-bit platforms? How do we arrange for > that to be the case? I don't see any magic in pg_type.h but I'm not sure what > I'm looking for. Not AFAIK. It would involve fiddeling the catalog, tricky since the catalog genration script doesn't understand #ifdef's. Also you would have to add conditionals for the the PG_RETURN_* and PG_GET* macros. > I'm asking because I have another 8-byte data type I want to use and it would > be nice to have that same property, assuming we have it for int8. Yes that'd be nice, but not entirely straightforward. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFE/VNVIB7bNG8LQkwRAm0vAJ4jzJwYqubYrdlK8vju1kMxLic5gwC gi5dh TuS1gZdUdo8VV31tq1Cn7bA= =Scz7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |