Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Revise psql pattern-matching switches
This is a discussion on Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Revise psql pattern-matching switches within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Tom Lane wrote: > Log Message: > ----------- > Revise psql pattern-matching switches as per discussion. The rule is ...
| |||||||
![Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Revise psql pattern-matching switches](http://www.unixadmintalk.com/iconimages/pgsql-hackers/re-committers-pgsql-revise-psql-pattern-matching-switches_ltr.gif)
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
04-12-2008, 06:13 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Revise psql pattern-matching switches Tom Lane wrote: > Log Message: > ----------- > Revise psql pattern-matching switches as per discussion. The rule is now ---- Uh, you mean pg_dump, right? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > to process all inclusion switches then all exclusion switches, so that the > behavior is independent of switch ordering. > Use of -T does not cause non-table objects to be suppressed. And > the patterns are now interpreted the same way psql's \d commands do it, > rather than as pure regex commands; this allows for example -t schema.tab > to do what it should have been doing all along. Re-enable the --blobs > switch to do something useful, ie, add back blobs into a dump they were > otherwise suppressed from. > > Modified Files: > -------------- > pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ref: > pg_dump.sgml (r1.89 -> r1.90) > (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsw...1=1.89&r2=1.90) > pgsql/src/bin/pg_dump: > common.c (r1.93 -> r1.94) > (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsw...1=1.93&r2=1.94) > pg_dump.c (r1.452 -> r1.453) > (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsw...1.452&r2=1.453) > pg_dump.h (r1.129 -> r1.130) > (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsw...1.129&r2=1.130) > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq      |
|
04-12-2008, 06:13 AM
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Revise psql pattern-matching switches as per discussion. Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Log Message: >> ----------- >> Revise psql pattern-matching switches as per discussion. The rule is now > ---- > Uh, you mean pg_dump, right? Sheesh, and I did read that message over twice before committing :-(. Long day, time for a break. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org |
Linear Mode
