Unix Technical Forum

Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp 7.3.16.

This is a discussion on Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp 7.3.16. within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Tom Lane wrote: > Log Message: > ----------- > Stamp 7.3.16. > > Tags: > ---- > REL7_3_STABLE > ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > PostgreSQL > pgsql Hackers

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-12-2008, 05:17 AM
Bruce Momjian
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp 7.3.16.

Tom Lane wrote:
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Stamp 7.3.16.
>
> Tags:
> ----
> REL7_3_STABLE
>
> Modified Files:
> --------------
> pgsql:
> configure.in (r1.217.2.24 -> r1.217.2.25)
> (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsw...&r2=1.217.2.25)
> configure (r1.226.2.26 -> r1.226.2.27)
> (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsw...&r2=1.226.2.27)


Uh, I thought only Marc was supposed to do that before packaging? I was
skipping it.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-12-2008, 05:17 AM
Tom Lane
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp 7.3.16.

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Stamp 7.3.16.


> Uh, I thought only Marc was supposed to do that before packaging? I was
> skipping it.


I've done it the last few times for back-branch releases --- I was under
the impression that Marc didn't have an installed copy anymore of the
old autoconf required to do it correctly for pre-8.1 branches.

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-12-2008, 05:17 AM
Bruce Momjian
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp 7.3.16.

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Stamp 7.3.16.

>
> > Uh, I thought only Marc was supposed to do that before packaging? I was
> > skipping it.

>
> I've done it the last few times for back-branch releases --- I was under
> the impression that Marc didn't have an installed copy anymore of the
> old autoconf required to do it correctly for pre-8.1 branches.


Perhaps. I only remember the discussion that I wasn't supposed to do it
as part of my general stamping. Perhaps the idea was that it should be
done on the day it is packaged, while I usually stamp several days
before that.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com