Unix Technical Forum

Re: On-disk bitmap index patch

This is a discussion on Re: On-disk bitmap index patch within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Mark, > -----Original Message----- > From: mark@mark.mielke.cc [mailto:mark@mark.mielke.cc] > Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 9:26 PM > > But ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > PostgreSQL > pgsql Hackers

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-12-2008, 03:46 AM
Luke Lonergan
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: On-disk bitmap index patch

Mark,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mark@mark.mielke.cc [mailto:mark@mark.mielke.cc]
> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 9:26 PM
>
> But irrefutable? Irrefutable is not true. :-)


How about unrefuted. The evidence has not been refuted, and not
directly discussed or discounted.

BTREE can not be optimized to produce the results we've presented, the
discussion about char(n) datatypes was irrelevant as we had shown
results for INT, numeric and char/varchar and they were all dramatically
better than BTREE.

I am hopeful this discussion takes a rapid turn toward the quantitative
assessment of the results.

- Luke


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-12-2008, 03:46 AM
Bruce Momjian
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: On-disk bitmap index patch

Luke Lonergan wrote:
> Mark,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mark@mark.mielke.cc [mailto:mark@mark.mielke.cc]
> > Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 9:26 PM
> >
> > But irrefutable? Irrefutable is not true. :-)

>
> How about unrefuted. The evidence has not been refuted, and not
> directly discussed or discounted.
>
> BTREE can not be optimized to produce the results we've presented, the
> discussion about char(n) datatypes was irrelevant as we had shown
> results for INT, numeric and char/varchar and they were all dramatically
> better than BTREE.
>
> I am hopeful this discussion takes a rapid turn toward the quantitative
> assessment of the results.


Right. People need a patch to test on their workloads, and analysis can
be done after feature freeze.

--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-12-2008, 03:46 AM
Luke Lonergan
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: On-disk bitmap index patch

Bruce,

On 7/29/06 6:31 AM, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:

> Right. People need a patch to test on their workloads, and analysis can
> be done after feature freeze.


Fair enough.

- Luke



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com