Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG coredistribution?
This is a discussion on Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG coredistribution? within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 17:03 -0300, Tom Lane wrote: > [. . .] I think it > would be ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
07-22-2008, 06:58 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG coredistribution? On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 17:03 -0300, Tom Lane wrote: > [. . .] I think it > would be a good idea to be open to reviewing pgfoundry code with the > same standards we'd use if we were going to integrate it. Perhaps > commitfest is not the right venue for that, though, if only because > of the possibility of confusion over what's supposed to happen. I think this would be a great idea. I would be overjoyed to have veil http://pgfoundry.org/projects/veil/ reviewed by postgres developers. __ Marc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBIhO7LUBr6u+c2wkERAs+xAJ9p3UxAdiB4uVcbt5mWYo 0UGDPmYACfZ/Ip VA8tt3gFWnX514G8NUTAj/Y= =fONY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----      |
Linear Mode
