Re: function body actors (was: [PERFORM] viewing source code)
This is a discussion on Re: function body actors (was: [PERFORM] viewing source code) within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> On Fri, 2007-21-12 at 18:05 -0400, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca> wrote: > > > 2. Protect the content of a ...
| |||||||
![Re: function body actors (was: [PERFORM] viewing source code)](http://www.unixadmintalk.com/iconimages/pgsql-hackers/re-function-body-actors-perform-viewing-source-code_ltr.gif)
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
04-15-2008, 10:38 PM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: function body actors (was: [PERFORM] viewing source code) On Fri, 2007-21-12 at 18:05 -0400, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca> wrote: > > > 2. Protect the content of a field from _some_ users on a given > system, > > > > I would argue that (2) is reasonably well served today by setting up > > separate databases for separate users. > > I thought actually this was one of the use-cases we were hearing. > Different people using the same database (because the same data), with > rules about the different staff being able to see this or that > function body. I can easily imagine such a case, for instance, in a > large organization with different departments and different > responsibilities. It seems a shame that the only answer we have there > is, "Give them different databases." There is also Veil: http://veil.projects.postgresql.org/curdocs/index.html __ Marc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBHbFocUBr6u+c2wkERAhkPAJ9jhFF9iSxxiF0OAFmB43/T6e2VoQCdGM+A zMo2Y9ZLBi/SJZpq6POF90g= =qnDx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----      |
Linear Mode
