vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| > > It would keep the old table around while building the new, then grab > > an exclusive lock to swap the two. > > Lock upgrading is right out. It would need a whole of new family of "intent" locks, with different rules. Andreas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly |