Re: [PATCHES] Forcing current WAL file to be archived
This is a discussion on Re: [PATCHES] Forcing current WAL file to be archived within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Patch included to implement xlog switching, using an xlog record > "processing instruction" and ...
| |||||||
![Re: [PATCHES] Forcing current WAL file to be archived](http://www.unixadmintalk.com/iconimages/pgsql-hackers/re-patches-forcing-current-wal-file-archived_ltr.gif)
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
04-12-2008, 04:51 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: [PATCHES] Forcing current WAL file to be archived Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Patch included to implement xlog switching, using an xlog record > "processing instruction" and forcibly moving xlog pointers. Just to be clear --- does this fully supersede your draft patch of 27-July, or is that still on the table too? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings      |
|
04-12-2008, 04:52 AM
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: [PATCHES] Forcing current WAL file to be archived On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 18:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > > Patch included to implement xlog switching, using an xlog record > > "processing instruction" and forcibly moving xlog pointers. > > Just to be clear --- does this fully supersede your draft patch of > 27-July, or is that still on the table too? Sorry for lack of clarity. This patch supersedes the draft patch of 27 July, which should have been marked more clearly as WIP. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq |
Linear Mode
