This is a discussion on Re: [PATCHES] Linking on AIX (Was: Fix linking of OpenLDAP libraries ) within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Tom Lane wrote: > The proposed patch to Makefile.shlib makes me gag :-( ... It is ugly. > lying ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Tom Lane wrote: > The proposed patch to Makefile.shlib makes me gag :-( ... It is ugly. > lying to make > about what's the purpose of a rule is seldom a good idea. Please try > as attached instead. I will ASAP. > Also, I am *really* dubious about the change to > ecpg/test/Makefile.regress --- if that's necessary then this whole > exercise is wrong. For a dynamic build you do not need the change. Only a --disable-shared build will gag without it. I'll have a look at that too. Yours, Laurenz Albe ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster |
| ||||
| "Albe Laurenz" <all@adv.magwien.gv.at> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Also, I am *really* dubious about the change to >> ecpg/test/Makefile.regress --- if that's necessary then this whole >> exercise is wrong. > For a dynamic build you do not need the change. > Only a --disable-shared build will gag without it. Ah. In that case I think the answer is that that makefile should be using $(libpq) or possibly $(libpq_pgport) from Makefile.global, rather than bare "-lpq". regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|