This is a discussion on Re: [PATCHES] Use non-deprecated APIs for dynloader/darwin.c within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> On Oct 8, 2006, at 14:29, Tom Lane wrote: > Looks good, but I don't think we want to ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| On Oct 8, 2006, at 14:29, Tom Lane wrote: > Looks good, but I don't think we want to abandon OSX 10.2 support > just yet. I'll revise this to use a configure probe for dlopen. Maybe we can abandon Mac OS X 10.2 in 8.3 and later? And not back- port these patches to the 7.x, 8.0, and 8.1 branches? BTW, I think the configure probe (only on Darwin, correct?) should test for the existence of <dlfcn.h>. > My inclination is to apply this one now, since it only affects OSX > and should be easily testable, but to hold off on your other patch > for portable Bonjour support until 8.3 devel starts. The portability > implications of that one are unclear, and I don't know how to test it > either, so I think putting it in now is too much risk. The Bonjour patch wasn't intended to be portable to other platforms just yet. As submitted, it has the same risks/advantages as this dlopen() patch -- it only works on 10.3 and later, but isn't deprecated in 10.4. If we want to keep 10.2 support for Bonjour, we can test for both DNSServiceDiscovery.h and dns_sd.h in ./configure, and prefer dns_sd.h if it's found (which will be the case for 10.3 and 10.4) but use DNSServiceDiscovery.h if not (which will be the case for 10.2). Thanks! - Chris ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings |
| |||
| Chris Campbell <chris@bignerdranch.com> writes: > On Oct 8, 2006, at 14:29, Tom Lane wrote: >> Looks good, but I don't think we want to abandon OSX 10.2 support >> just yet. I'll revise this to use a configure probe for dlopen. > Maybe we can abandon Mac OS X 10.2 in 8.3 and later? And not back- > port these patches to the 7.x, 8.0, and 8.1 branches? I don't see any particular reason to abandon 10.2 at all, as long as all it's costing us is a couple dozen lines in dynloader/darwin.c. As for back-porting, I don't see a strong reason to do that either. Apple will presumably maintain the compatibility APIs for a long while yet. > BTW, I think the configure probe (only on Darwin, correct?) should > test for the existence of <dlfcn.h>. I realized that configure is already probing for dlopen(), so I just used HAVE_DLOPEN. We can add a separate test for the header file if it proves really necessary, but I bet it's not. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings |
| |||
| The Darwin dlopen() patch has already been applied. Where are we on the Bonjour patch? Do we want code that works on Darwin 10.2 and 10.3? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chris Campbell wrote: > On Oct 8, 2006, at 14:29, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Looks good, but I don't think we want to abandon OSX 10.2 support > > just yet. I'll revise this to use a configure probe for dlopen. > > Maybe we can abandon Mac OS X 10.2 in 8.3 and later? And not back- > port these patches to the 7.x, 8.0, and 8.1 branches? > > BTW, I think the configure probe (only on Darwin, correct?) should > test for the existence of <dlfcn.h>. > > > My inclination is to apply this one now, since it only affects OSX > > and should be easily testable, but to hold off on your other patch > > for portable Bonjour support until 8.3 devel starts. The portability > > implications of that one are unclear, and I don't know how to test it > > either, so I think putting it in now is too much risk. > > The Bonjour patch wasn't intended to be portable to other platforms > just yet. As submitted, it has the same risks/advantages as this > dlopen() patch -- it only works on 10.3 and later, but isn't > deprecated in 10.4. > > If we want to keep 10.2 support for Bonjour, we can test for both > DNSServiceDiscovery.h and dns_sd.h in ./configure, and prefer > dns_sd.h if it's found (which will be the case for 10.3 and 10.4) but > use DNSServiceDiscovery.h if not (which will be the case for 10.2). > > Thanks! > > - Chris > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend |
| |||
| With no new version from the author and no working version for all supported OS/X version, I am saving this patch for 8.4. This has been saved for the 8.4 release: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chris Campbell wrote: > On Oct 8, 2006, at 14:29, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Looks good, but I don't think we want to abandon OSX 10.2 support > > just yet. I'll revise this to use a configure probe for dlopen. > > Maybe we can abandon Mac OS X 10.2 in 8.3 and later? And not back- > port these patches to the 7.x, 8.0, and 8.1 branches? > > BTW, I think the configure probe (only on Darwin, correct?) should > test for the existence of <dlfcn.h>. > > > My inclination is to apply this one now, since it only affects OSX > > and should be easily testable, but to hold off on your other patch > > for portable Bonjour support until 8.3 devel starts. The portability > > implications of that one are unclear, and I don't know how to test it > > either, so I think putting it in now is too much risk. > > The Bonjour patch wasn't intended to be portable to other platforms > just yet. As submitted, it has the same risks/advantages as this > dlopen() patch -- it only works on 10.3 and later, but isn't > deprecated in 10.4. > > If we want to keep 10.2 support for Bonjour, we can test for both > DNSServiceDiscovery.h and dns_sd.h in ./configure, and prefer > dns_sd.h if it's found (which will be the case for 10.3 and 10.4) but > use DNSServiceDiscovery.h if not (which will be the case for 10.2). > > Thanks! > > - Chris > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq |
| |||
| Ah, I already had this on the TODO list with URLs, so I will not put it in the hold queue. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chris Campbell wrote: > On Oct 8, 2006, at 14:29, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Looks good, but I don't think we want to abandon OSX 10.2 support > > just yet. I'll revise this to use a configure probe for dlopen. > > Maybe we can abandon Mac OS X 10.2 in 8.3 and later? And not back- > port these patches to the 7.x, 8.0, and 8.1 branches? > > BTW, I think the configure probe (only on Darwin, correct?) should > test for the existence of <dlfcn.h>. > > > My inclination is to apply this one now, since it only affects OSX > > and should be easily testable, but to hold off on your other patch > > for portable Bonjour support until 8.3 devel starts. The portability > > implications of that one are unclear, and I don't know how to test it > > either, so I think putting it in now is too much risk. > > The Bonjour patch wasn't intended to be portable to other platforms > just yet. As submitted, it has the same risks/advantages as this > dlopen() patch -- it only works on 10.3 and later, but isn't > deprecated in 10.4. > > If we want to keep 10.2 support for Bonjour, we can test for both > DNSServiceDiscovery.h and dns_sd.h in ./configure, and prefer > dns_sd.h if it's found (which will be the case for 10.3 and 10.4) but > use DNSServiceDiscovery.h if not (which will be the case for 10.2). > > Thanks! > > - Chris > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster |
| ||||
| Actually, can we now say we only support OS/X 10.3 and later. If so, we can use the patch unchanged. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Ah, I already had this on the TODO list with URLs, so I will not put it > in the hold queue. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Chris Campbell wrote: > > On Oct 8, 2006, at 14:29, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > > Looks good, but I don't think we want to abandon OSX 10.2 support > > > just yet. I'll revise this to use a configure probe for dlopen. > > > > Maybe we can abandon Mac OS X 10.2 in 8.3 and later? And not back- > > port these patches to the 7.x, 8.0, and 8.1 branches? > > > > BTW, I think the configure probe (only on Darwin, correct?) should > > test for the existence of <dlfcn.h>. > > > > > My inclination is to apply this one now, since it only affects OSX > > > and should be easily testable, but to hold off on your other patch > > > for portable Bonjour support until 8.3 devel starts. The portability > > > implications of that one are unclear, and I don't know how to test it > > > either, so I think putting it in now is too much risk. > > > > The Bonjour patch wasn't intended to be portable to other platforms > > just yet. As submitted, it has the same risks/advantages as this > > dlopen() patch -- it only works on 10.3 and later, but isn't > > deprecated in 10.4. > > > > If we want to keep 10.2 support for Bonjour, we can test for both > > DNSServiceDiscovery.h and dns_sd.h in ./configure, and prefer > > dns_sd.h if it's found (which will be the case for 10.3 and 10.4) but > > use DNSServiceDiscovery.h if not (which will be the case for 10.2). > > > > Thanks! > > > > - Chris > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings > > -- > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us > EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com > > + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq |