SEO

#1 (**permalink**) 04-11-2008, 06:24 AM

> > > OK, running the latest patch. Observations:
> > > ...
> > > I ran tests for about an hour, randomly killing/canceling
> backends
> > > without any problems.
> >
> > Are we all comfortable that
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql...0/msg01009.php
> > is OK to apply?
>
> Yea. I can vouch for Magnus as well (he said so off list).
> I'd vote with my own servers anyways.

Yup, and I can also vouch fo rmyself ;-) Just didn't get around to it
until now.

Yes, I believe we should be fine with that patch, even though we're late
in beta. It's a huge win, so I htink it's worth the small extra risk it
is.

//Magnus

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

#2 (**permalink**) 04-11-2008, 06:24 AM

"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
>>> Are we all comfortable that
>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql...0/msg01009.php
>>> is OK to apply?
>>
>> Yea. I can vouch for Magnus as well (he said so off list).
>> I'd vote with my own servers anyways.

> Yup, and I can also vouch fo rmyself ;-) Just didn't get around to it
> until now.

> Yes, I believe we should be fine with that patch, even though we're late
> in beta. It's a huge win, so I htink it's worth the small extra risk it
> is.

OK, patch committed. Please recheck that CVS tip is OK.

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

SEO

Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance