Unix Technical Forum

Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition

This is a discussion on Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Martijn van Oosterhout Wrote: > Has it actually happened to you? PostgreSQL is pretty good > about its memory ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > PostgreSQL > pgsql Hackers

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 06:04 AM
John Hansen
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: PG Killed by OOM Condition

Martijn van Oosterhout Wrote:

> Has it actually happened to you? PostgreSQL is pretty good
> about its memory usage. Besides, seems to me it should be an
> system admisitrator descision.


No, Just came across this by chance, and thought it might be a good
idea.
Perhaps as a postgresql.conf setting.

.... John


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com