Unix Technical Forum

Re: PG-MQ?

This is a discussion on Re: PG-MQ? within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Do you guys need something PG specific or built into PG? ActiveMQ is very nice, speaks multiple languages, protocols ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > PostgreSQL > pgsql Hackers

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-12-2008, 10:11 AM
Rob Butler
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: PG-MQ?

Do you guys need something PG specific or built into PG?

ActiveMQ is very nice, speaks multiple languages, protocols and supports a ton of features. Could you simply use that?

http://activemq.apache.org/

Rob




__________________________________________________ __________________________________
Get the free Yahoo! toolbar and rest assured with the added security of spyware protection.
http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar...rton/index.php

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-12-2008, 10:11 AM
Jeroen T. Vermeulen
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: PG-MQ?

On Wed, June 20, 2007 19:42, Rob Butler wrote:
> Do you guys need something PG specific or built into PG?
>
> ActiveMQ is very nice, speaks multiple languages, protocols and supports a
> ton of features. Could you simply use that?
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/


Looks very nice indeed!


Jeroen



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-12-2008, 10:11 AM
Marko Kreen
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: PG-MQ?

On 6/20/07, Rob Butler <crodster2k@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Do you guys need something PG specific or built into PG?


Yes, we need it usable from inside the DB, thus the PgQ.

That means the events are also transactional with other
things happening in the DB.

> ActiveMQ is very nice, speaks multiple languages, protocols and supports a ton of features. Could you simply use that?


I guess that if you need standalone message broker, the
ActiveMQ may be good choice. At least, any solution that
avoids the database when passing messages should outperform
solutions that pipe stuff thru (general-purpose) database.

OTOH, if you _do_ need to transport the events via database
it should be very hard to outperform PgQ. As it uses the
user-level xid/snapshot trick introduced by rserv/erserver/slony,
which is not possible with other databases other than PostgreSQL.

--
marko

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com