Unix Technical Forum

Re: [pgsql-www] New email list for emergency communications

This is a discussion on Re: [pgsql-www] New email list for emergency communications within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca> writes: > >> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 06:39:25PM -0400, Andrew ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > PostgreSQL > pgsql Hackers

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 10:48 PM
Andrew Dunstan
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [pgsql-www] New email list for emergency communications



Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 06:39:25PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>> perusing a mailbox again. We have unfortunately been badly underprepared
>>> for this.
>>>

>
>
>> Surely that there is an emerging consensus to that effect means that it's
>> not as unfortunate as it might be? I seem to recall the original
>> announcement suggesting this was an experiment. I wouldn't expect the first
>> couple rounds to go without a hitch; as long as there is procedural
>> improvement the next time, that's a good thing, right?
>>

>
> Yeah, we expected to have glitches. I think we now have a much better
> idea what sort of status-tracking support we need for future fests.
>
>
>


Yes. I'm not meaning to whine, sorry if it comes over like that. It
looks to me like we need a sort of prep phase for a commit-fest, so the
people switching into commit-fest mode when it starts can do so with
little friction.

cheers

andrew

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 10:48 PM
Bruce Momjian
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [pgsql-www] New email list for emergencycommunications

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >> Surely that there is an emerging consensus to that effect means that it's
> >> not as unfortunate as it might be? I seem to recall the original
> >> announcement suggesting this was an experiment. I wouldn't expect the first
> >> couple rounds to go without a hitch; as long as there is procedural
> >> improvement the next time, that's a good thing, right?
> >>

> >
> > Yeah, we expected to have glitches. I think we now have a much better
> > idea what sort of status-tracking support we need for future fests.
> >
> >
> >

>
> Yes. I'm not meaning to whine, sorry if it comes over like that. It
> looks to me like we need a sort of prep phase for a commit-fest, so the
> people switching into commit-fest mode when it starts can do so with
> little friction.


Yea, I think we are still learning, and polishing our tools.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com