Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3242: FATAL: could not unlock semaphore:error code 298
This is a discussion on Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3242: FATAL: could not unlock semaphore:error code 298 within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >> The effective max count on Unixen is typically in the thousands, >> and I'd ...
| |||||||
![Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3242: FATAL: could not unlock semaphore:error code 298](http://www.unixadmintalk.com/iconimages/pgsql-hackers/re-re-bugs-bug-3242-fatal-could-not-unlock-semaphore-error-code-298-a_ltr.gif)
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
04-12-2008, 08:22 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3242: FATAL: could not unlock semaphore:error code 298 Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >> The effective max count on Unixen is typically in the thousands, >> and I'd suggest the same on Windows unless there's some efficiency >> reason to keep it small (in which case, maybe ten would do). >> > > AFAIK there's no problem with huge numbers (it takes an int32, and the > documentation says nothing about a limit - I'm sure it's just a 32-bit > counter in the kernel). I'll give that a shot. > > Linux manpage suggests local max is 32767, so that's probably a good value to try. cheers andrew ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate      |
 |
« Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: [PATCHES] Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATEDpatch
|
modifying the table function »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:01 AM.
