Unix Technical Forum

Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch:synchronized_scanning GUC variable

This is a discussion on Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch:synchronized_scanning GUC variable within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Dimitri Fontaine wrote: -- Start of PGP signed section. > Hi, > > Le jeudi 31 janvier 2008, Tom ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > PostgreSQL > pgsql Hackers

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 10:42 PM
Bruce Momjian
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch:synchronized_scanning GUC variable

Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> Hi,
>
> Le jeudi 31 janvier 2008, Tom Lane a ?crit?:
> > We have *never* promised that pg_dump version N could dump from server
> > version N+1 .., in fact, personally I'd like to make that case be a hard
> > error, rather than something people could override with -i.

>
> Are you thinking about next major or minor version ? All the same?
> Is there some real good reason not to dump say 8.2.6 server with the pg_dump
> from an 8.2.5 installation?


They are talking about cross-major dumps, 8.2 pg_dump dumping an 8.3
database. They are saying that should be disallowed.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-15-2008, 10:42 PM
Gregory Stark
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: {**Spam**} Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch: synchronized_scanning GUC variable

"Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us> writes:

> Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> -- Start of PGP signed section.
>> Hi,
>>
>> Le jeudi 31 janvier 2008, Tom Lane a ?crit?:
>> > We have *never* promised that pg_dump version N could dump from server
>> > version N+1 .., in fact, personally I'd like to make that case be a hard
>> > error, rather than something people could override with -i.

>>
>> Are you thinking about next major or minor version ? All the same?
>> Is there some real good reason not to dump say 8.2.6 server with the pg_dump
>> from an 8.2.5 installation?

>
> They are talking about cross-major dumps, 8.2 pg_dump dumping an 8.3
> database. They are saying that should be disallowed.


And just to be clearly *only* cross-major dumps with an *older* pg_dump than
the database. Dumping with a newer pg_dump than the database is the
recommended way to do cross-major dumps.

Perhaps we can have something like --force-unsupported-incompatible-connections

1/2

--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostGIS support!

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com