SEO

#1 (**permalink**) 04-11-2008, 03:12 AM

> Now that Tom has gotten the ARC->2Q changes into the 8.0.x Branch, and

>Josh has had some time to do some preliminary performance
>testing on it,
>we need to put out 8.0.2 ...
>
>Core's hope is to wrap a beta up on Friday (tomorrow), and
>baring any bugs
>found in it, do a full release next Thursday.
>
>The reason for the gap is to give a bit of extra testing time
>due to the
>ARC->2Q changes ...
>
>Is anyone sitting on anything that they feel needs/should get
>into 8.0.2?

I have three pending kerberos patches, two of which are plain bugfixes
and one which I'd argue is a bugfix around a can't-compile issue, that
I'd very much like to see in 8.0.2. The bugfixes are general (both bit
me rather badly on linux while testing before I got into the win32 part
of the testing), the compile fix is win32 specific.

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql...3/msg00148.php
(bugfix)
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql...3/msg00150.php
(compile fix)
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql...3/msg00181.php
(bugfix)

//Magnus

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

#2 (**permalink**) 04-11-2008, 03:12 AM

Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Now that Tom has gotten the ARC->2Q changes into the 8.0.x Branch, and
>
> >Josh has had some time to do some preliminary performance
> >testing on it,
> >we need to put out 8.0.2 ...
> >
> >Core's hope is to wrap a beta up on Friday (tomorrow), and
> >baring any bugs
> >found in it, do a full release next Thursday.
> >
> >The reason for the gap is to give a bit of extra testing time
> >due to the
> >ARC->2Q changes ...
> >
> >Is anyone sitting on anything that they feel needs/should get
> >into 8.0.2?
>
> I have three pending kerberos patches, two of which are plain bugfixes
> and one which I'd argue is a bugfix around a can't-compile issue, that
> I'd very much like to see in 8.0.2. The bugfixes are general (both bit
> me rather badly on linux while testing before I got into the win32 part
> of the testing), the compile fix is win32 specific.
>
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql...3/msg00148.php
> (bugfix)
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql...3/msg00150.php
> (compile fix)
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql...3/msg00181.php
> (bugfix)

I have all of them in the patches queue now.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

#3 (**permalink**) 04-11-2008, 03:12 AM

"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
> I have three pending kerberos patches, two of which are plain bugfixes
> and one which I'd argue is a bugfix around a can't-compile issue, that
> I'd very much like to see in 8.0.2.

Working on these. Don't you have the test backwards here?

***************
*** 436,442 ****

krb5_free_principal(pg_krb5_context, server);

! if (fcntl(sock, F_SETFL, (long) flags))
{
char sebuf[256];

--- 434,440 ----

krb5_free_principal(pg_krb5_context, server);

! if (set_noblock(sock))
{
char sebuf[256];

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

SEO

Re: Upcoming 8.0.2 Release