This is a discussion on Re: Updatable views/with check option parsing within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> > > While I don't think that making WITH a fully reserved word would cause > > any great ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| > > While I don't think that making WITH a fully reserved word would cause > > any great damage, I'm unwilling to do it just to save a couple of lines > > of code. > > I think we should go on and do promote WITH to a reserved keyword now Oracle, MS-SQL, DB2, MySQL and Informix also have WITH reserved, so it would imho be ok to do it if it simplifies code. Andreas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings |