This is a discussion on Re: Wild idea: 9.0? within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Josh Berkus wrote: > Between major > improvements to performance, major changes to the file format, and changes to ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Josh Berkus wrote: > Between major > improvements to performance, major changes to the file format, and changes to > implicit conversions breaking backwards compatibility, our new ability to > more-or-less stick to deadlines ... > > ... should this be 9.0 instead of 8.3? > > Seems like it'd be both an annoucement of how far we've come, as well as a > warning to users that the 8.2-->9.0 upgrade could be painful. And that some > of our more radical features in the new version could have some rough edges. > > Of course, that does put is closer to 10.0 which is going to break a lot of > packager's scripts. ;-) > > Thoughts? I like 8.3 better personally. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org |