Unix Technical Forum

SEO

vBulletin Search Engine Optimization


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > PostgreSQL > pgsql Hackers

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 05:28 AM
Tom Lane
 
Posts: n/a
Default SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2

Has anyone been able to set kern.sysv.shmmax above 4MB at all in latest
OS X? I just spent a while trying what seemed every possible
permutation of setting up /etc/sysctl.conf and editing /etc/rc directly,
and it just fails (symptom: sysctl shows shmmax as -1, and Postgres
cannot start).

Grrr. Apple's been pretty lame about this from day one, but at least
it's been possible to do it one way or another.

(Curiously, it seems you can now change shmall after bootup in 10.4.2,
but that's not much help when you can't change shmmax.)

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 05:28 AM
Luke Lonergan
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2

Tom,

On 8/29/05 5:18 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Has anyone been able to set kern.sysv.shmmax above 4MB at all in latest
> OS X? I just spent a while trying what seemed every possible
> permutation of setting up /etc/sysctl.conf and editing /etc/rc directly,
> and it just fails (symptom: sysctl shows shmmax as -1, and Postgres
> cannot start).
>
> Grrr. Apple's been pretty lame about this from day one, but at least
> it's been possible to do it one way or another.
>
> (Curiously, it seems you can now change shmall after bootup in 10.4.2,
> but that's not much help when you can't change shmmax.)


Yes - it's very strange, I've had the same experience though I finally found
that setting SHMMAX and SHMALL to the same values, namely 268435456, seems
to work out fine.

I don't have a hypothesis as to why that value works though. I suspect that
equal values of all sizes would work, though I stopped trying when I found
this pair and it worked on multiple machines.

- Luke



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 05:28 AM
Joshua D. Drake
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2

Tom Lane wrote:

>Has anyone been able to set kern.sysv.shmmax above 4MB at all in latest
>OS X? I just spent a while trying what seemed every possible
>permutation of setting up /etc/sysctl.conf and editing /etc/rc directly,
>and it just fails (symptom: sysctl shows shmmax as -1, and Postgres
>cannot start).'
>

Is this perhaps one of the artificial limitations that they put in
place to make you buy Apple OSX Server?

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



>
>Grrr. Apple's been pretty lame about this from day one, but at least
>it's been possible to do it one way or another.
>
>(Curiously, it seems you can now change shmall after bootup in 10.4.2,
>but that's not much help when you can't change shmmax.)
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 05:28 AM
Tom Lane
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2

"Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com> writes:
> Yes - it's very strange, I've had the same experience though I finally found
> that setting SHMMAX and SHMALL to the same values, namely 268435456, seems
> to work out fine.


Interesting. I wonder if there's some bit of code that thinks that
SHMALL is measured in bytes (contrary to OSX's general convention
that it's measured in pages).

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 05:28 AM
Jeff -
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2


On Aug 29, 2005, at 8:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Has anyone been able to set kern.sysv.shmmax above 4MB at all in
> latest
> OS X? I just spent a while trying what seemed every possible
> permutation of setting up /etc/sysctl.conf and editing /etc/rc
> directly,
> and it just fails (symptom: sysctl shows shmmax as -1, and Postgres
> cannot start).
>

yeah, you need to set shmmax and shmall. shmall seems to be measured
in pages.
Here's the settings I've been using:

skittlebrau:/etc root# grep shm rc
# sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmmax=4194305 kern.sysv.shmmin=1
kern.sysv.shmmni=32 kern.sysv.shmseg=8 kern.sysv.shmall=1024
sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmmax=335544320
sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmmin=1
sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmmni=32
sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmseg=16
sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmall=327680

and just to verify:

skittlebrau:/etc root# sysctl -a | grep shm
kern.sysv.shmmax: 335544320
kern.sysv.shmmin: 1
kern.sysv.shmmni: 32
kern.sysv.shmseg: 16
kern.sysv.shmall: 327680

I've been running PG ith 10k shared bufs for a while.

The pain is sometimes /ec/rc gets rewritten

--
Jeff Trout <jeff@jefftrout.com>
http://www.jefftrout.com/
http://www.stuarthamm.net/





---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 05:28 AM
Thomas F. O'Connell
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2

In order to get postgres working in concert with an iSight on a
PowerBook, I had to increase shmmax, and it seemed to work just fine
by editing /etc/rc:

sysctl -w kern.sysv.shmmax=134217728 kern.sysv.shmmin=1
kern.sysv.shmmni=32 kern.sysv.shmseg=8 kern.sysv.shmall=1024

After restarting, I have:

# sysctl -a | grep shm
kern.sysv.shmmax: 134217728
kern.sysv.shmmin: 1
kern.sysv.shmmni: 32
kern.sysv.shmseg: 8
kern.sysv.shmall: 1024

Of course, this still doesn't seem to be enough to let postgres play
nicely with the iSight...

--
Thomas F. O'Connell
Co-Founder, Information Architect
Sitening, LLC

Strategic Open Source: Open Your i™

http://www.sitening.com/
110 30th Avenue North, Suite 6
Nashville, TN 37203-6320
615-469-5150
615-469-5151 (fax)

On Aug 29, 2005, at 7:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> Has anyone been able to set kern.sysv.shmmax above 4MB at all in
> latest
> OS X? I just spent a while trying what seemed every possible
> permutation of setting up /etc/sysctl.conf and editing /etc/rc
> directly,
> and it just fails (symptom: sysctl shows shmmax as -1, and Postgres
> cannot start).
>
> Grrr. Apple's been pretty lame about this from day one, but at least
> it's been possible to do it one way or another.
>
> (Curiously, it seems you can now change shmall after bootup in 10.4.2,
> but that's not much help when you can't change shmmax.)
>
> regards, tom lane


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 05:28 AM
Luke Lonergan
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2

Tom,

On 8/29/05 6:41 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Interesting. I wonder if there's some bit of code that thinks that
> SHMALL is measured in bytes (contrary to OSX's general convention
> that it's measured in pages).


I don't know, but I agree that the behavior has changed from Panther to
Tiger.

I wish BSD/Apple would go the way of Solaris 10 and be dynamic. This
ipc/shmem limits business has been a plague since its introduction.

- Luke



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 05:28 AM
Tom Lane
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2

"Thomas F. O'Connell" <tfo@sitening.com> writes:
> After restarting, I have:


> # sysctl -a | grep shm
> kern.sysv.shmmax: 134217728
> kern.sysv.shmmin: 1
> kern.sysv.shmmni: 32
> kern.sysv.shmseg: 8
> kern.sysv.shmall: 1024


> Of course, this still doesn't seem to be enough to let postgres play
> nicely with the iSight...


Don't you need to increase shmall too?

Also, which OS X release is this? 10.4 seems to have regressed
compared to 10.3 :-(

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 05:28 AM
Thomas F. O'Connell
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2


On Aug 29, 2005, at 10:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> "Thomas F. O'Connell" <tfo@sitening.com> writes:
>
>> After restarting, I have:

>
>
>> # sysctl -a | grep shm
>> kern.sysv.shmmax: 134217728
>> kern.sysv.shmmin: 1
>> kern.sysv.shmmni: 32
>> kern.sysv.shmseg: 8
>> kern.sysv.shmall: 1024

>
>
>> Of course, this still doesn't seem to be enough to let postgres play
>> nicely with the iSight...

>
> Don't you need to increase shmall too?
>
> Also, which OS X release is this? 10.4 seems to have regressed
> compared to 10.3 :-(
>
> regards, tom lane


This is 10.4.2. Everything worked as advertised. I didn't need to
increase shmall for the settings to stick, but maybe I ought to for
them to work.

--
Thomas F. O'Connell
Co-Founder, Information Architect
Sitening, LLC

Strategic Open Source: Open Your i™

http://www.sitening.com/
110 30th Avenue North, Suite 6
Nashville, TN 37203-6320
615-469-5150
615-469-5151 (fax)


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-11-2008, 05:28 AM
Tom Lane
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2

Jeff - <threshar@torgo.978.org> writes:
> On Aug 29, 2005, at 8:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Has anyone been able to set kern.sysv.shmmax above 4MB at all in
>> latest OS X?


> yeah, you need to set shmmax and shmall.


Did that. Set shmall first, shmall second, both together in one sysctl
command; no joy anywhere. Are you trying this on fully up-to-date
Tiger?

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
UnixAdminTalk.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625