This is a discussion on UTF8 on Debian within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Something very strange is going on on my machine with UTF8: postgres=# show server_encoding; server_encoding ----------------- UTF8 (1 row) ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Something very strange is going on on my machine with UTF8: postgres=# show server_encoding; server_encoding ----------------- UTF8 (1 row) postgres=# select length(convert_from(E'\343\203\251\343\202\244\343 \202\273\343\203\263','utf8')); length -------- 8 (1 row) postgres=# select 'substring(s,'||i||',1)',convert_to(substring(s,i, 1),'utf8') from (select convert_from(E'\343\203\251\343\202\244\343\202\27 3\343\203\263','utf8') as s)a, (select generate_series(1,8) as i)b; ?column? | convert_to ------------------+------------ substring(s,1,1) | \343 substring(s,2,1) | \203\251 substring(s,3,1) | \343 substring(s,4,1) | \202\244 substring(s,5,1) | \343 substring(s,6,1) | \202\273 substring(s,7,1) | \343 substring(s,8,1) | \203\263 (8 rows) I believe this is in fact only four katakana characters. (Namely U+30E9 U+30A4 U+30BB U+30F3) \343 is merely the first byte of each three-byte encoding for the individual characters. Dave doesn't see the same behaviour on this three machines, so I think it's something unique to my machine. Possibly not a Postgres bug at all but some kind of install gotcha. I'm running Debian unstable with glibc 2.6.1-4 so it is a bit bleeding edge. But as I understand it the utf8 decoding is all our code anyways so I can't quite figure out how it could be glibc's fault. Does anybody else see anything like this? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly |
| |||
| "Gregory Stark" <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Something very strange is going on on my machine with UTF8: > > postgres=# show server_encoding; > server_encoding > ----------------- > UTF8 > (1 row) Hm. Well this doesn't look right: (gdb) p pg_wchar_table[PG_UTF8] $9 = {mb2wchar_with_len = 0x8364cff <pg_mule2wchar_with_len>, mblen = 0x8364eda <pg_mule_mblen>, dsplen = 0x8364f60 <pg_mule_dsplen>, mbverify = 0x83655cd <pg_mule_verifier>, maxmblen = 4} This looks like version skew around the file that Tom recently whacked around to restore binary compatibility with 8.2. But I can't see how -- I don't have any old header files in /usr/include or anything like that so I can't see how I could have picked up an out-of-date header file. -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster |
| |||
| The problem was simply that wchar.c has an array indexed by server encoding number. This puts the order back in sync. I don't haven't looked at the surrounding code enough to know if there aren't more problems like this lurking or if there's a way to fix it so it isn't such a pain to maintain. Index: src/backend/utils/mb/wchar.c ================================================== ================= RCS file: /home/stark/src/REPOSITORY/pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/wchar.c,v retrieving revision 1.64 diff -u -r1.64 wchar.c --- src/backend/utils/mb/wchar.c 18 Sep 2007 17:41:17 -0000 1.64 +++ src/backend/utils/mb/wchar.c 15 Oct 2007 21:53:06 -0000 @@ -1315,6 +1315,7 @@ {pg_euccn2wchar_with_len, pg_euccn_mblen, pg_euccn_dsplen, pg_euccn_verifier, 2}, /* 2; PG_EUC_CN */ {pg_euckr2wchar_with_len, pg_euckr_mblen, pg_euckr_dsplen, pg_euckr_verifier, 3}, /* 3; PG_EUC_KR */ {pg_euctw2wchar_with_len, pg_euctw_mblen, pg_euctw_dsplen, pg_euctw_verifier, 4}, /* 4; PG_EUC_TW */ + {pg_eucjp2wchar_with_len, pg_eucjp_mblen, pg_eucjp_dsplen, pg_eucjp_verifier, 3}, /* 33; PG_EUC_JIS_2004 */ {pg_utf2wchar_with_len, pg_utf_mblen, pg_utf_dsplen, pg_utf8_verifier, 4}, /* 5; PG_UTF8 */ {pg_mule2wchar_with_len, pg_mule_mblen, pg_mule_dsplen, pg_mule_verifier, 4}, /* 6; PG_MULE_INTERNAL */ {pg_latin12wchar_with_len, pg_latin1_mblen, pg_latin1_dsplen, pg_latin1_verifier, 1}, /* 7; PG_LATIN1 */ @@ -1343,13 +1344,12 @@ {pg_latin12wchar_with_len, pg_latin1_mblen, pg_latin1_dsplen, pg_latin1_verifier, 1}, /* 30; PG_WIN1254 */ {pg_latin12wchar_with_len, pg_latin1_mblen, pg_latin1_dsplen, pg_latin1_verifier, 1}, /* 31; PG_WIN1255 */ {pg_latin12wchar_with_len, pg_latin1_mblen, pg_latin1_dsplen, pg_latin1_verifier, 1}, /* 32; PG_WIN1257 */ - {pg_eucjp2wchar_with_len, pg_eucjp_mblen, pg_eucjp_dsplen, pg_eucjp_verifier, 3}, /* 33; PG_EUC_JIS_2004 */ {0, pg_sjis_mblen, pg_sjis_dsplen, pg_sjis_verifier, 2}, /* 34; PG_SJIS */ {0, pg_big5_mblen, pg_big5_dsplen, pg_big5_verifier, 2}, /* 35; PG_BIG5 */ {0, pg_gbk_mblen, pg_gbk_dsplen, pg_gbk_verifier, 2}, /* 36; PG_GBK */ {0, pg_uhc_mblen, pg_uhc_dsplen, pg_uhc_verifier, 2}, /* 37; PG_UHC */ - {pg_johab2wchar_with_len, pg_johab_mblen, pg_johab_dsplen, pg_johab_verifier, 3}, /* 38; PG_JOHAB */ {0, pg_gb18030_mblen, pg_gb18030_dsplen, pg_gb18030_verifier, 4}, /* 39; PG_GB18030 */ + {pg_johab2wchar_with_len, pg_johab_mblen, pg_johab_dsplen, pg_johab_verifier, 3}, /* 38; PG_JOHAB */ {0, pg_sjis_mblen, pg_sjis_dsplen, pg_sjis_verifier, 2} /* 40; PG_SHIFT_JIS_2004 */ }; -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match |
| |||
| Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Something very strange is going on on my machine with UTF8: Argh, I missed rearranging a couple of tables in the recent patch to fix up the encoding IDs. Will fix. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings |
| |||
| Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes: > ... This puts the order back in sync. I don't haven't looked at the > surrounding code enough to know if there aren't more problems like this > lurking or if there's a way to fix it so it isn't such a pain to maintain. The real problem is I believed the comment in pg_wchar.h that told me the only table that needed fixed was pg_enc2name :-( A check of Tatsuo's last couple of encoding-related commits confirms that there are only two order-sensitive tables, though, so I think we're good now. Also this time I troubled to run the src/test/mb/ tests, which I really should have tried earlier. Ah well. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match |
| |||
| "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes: > Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> Something very strange is going on on my machine with UTF8: > > Argh, I missed rearranging a couple of tables in the recent patch to fix > up the encoding IDs. Will fix. Hm, now things work correctly within the server if I play with text data generated with convert_from(). But I can't seem to send utf-8 text directlyin psql any more: postgres=# select 'ƒ‰ƒCƒZƒ“'; ?column? ---------- ' (1 row) postgres=# show client_encoding; client_encoding ----------------- UTF8 (1 row) postgres=# show server_encoding; server_encoding ----------------- UTF8 (1 row) -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq |
| |||
| "Gregory Stark" <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Hm, now things work correctly within the server if I play with text data > generated with convert_from(). But I can't seem to send utf-8 text directly in > psql any more: Ah, figured it out, nothing to do with the server. I didn't have the locale set to a UTF8 locale before starting up psql. I'm a bit puzzled how the locale psql is started up in works into this though. It seems to confuse psql's lexer at the least. But it goes to all this trouble to track client_encoding, shouldn't it be using that? Or at least warning you if the encoding it's run under doesn't match it? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org |
| ||||
| Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes: > Hm, now things work correctly within the server if I play with text data > generated with convert_from(). But I can't seem to send utf-8 text directly= > in > psql any more: Did you rebuild libpq.so? It's got the bogus table embedded in it too. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match |