SEO

#1 (**permalink**) 04-16-2008, 01:51 AM

Is there a URL showing which Win-32 ODBC binary is considered sufficiently
stable for production use?

--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

#2 (**permalink**) 04-16-2008, 01:51 AM

Am Montag, 20. Februar 2006 11:59 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
> Is there a URL showing which Win-32 ODBC binary is considered sufficiently
> stable for production use?

The latest one on the FTP server is the recommended one.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

#3 (**permalink**) 04-16-2008, 01:51 AM

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> Am Montag, 20. Februar 2006 11:59 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
> > Is there a URL showing which Win-32 ODBC binary is considered sufficiently
> > stable for production use?
>
> The latest one on the FTP server is the recommended one.

Yes, but /which/ FTP server and /where/? The last one I pulled was (I think)
when Hiroshi was still in charge, and since then as I understand it it's passed
through at least one set of hands- plus recent discussion I see here which
suggests that the project has forked into ODBC vs ODBCng.

--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

#4 (**permalink**) 04-16-2008, 01:51 AM

Am Montag, 20. Februar 2006 15:59 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Am Montag, 20. Februar 2006 11:59 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
> > > Is there a URL showing which Win-32 ODBC binary is considered
> > > sufficiently stable for production use?
> >
> > The latest one on the FTP server is the recommended one.
>
> Yes, but /which/ FTP server and /where/?

ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/odbc/

Anything else is a counterrevolutionary conspiracy.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

#5 (**permalink**) 04-16-2008, 01:51 AM

Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>> Am Montag, 20. Februar 2006 11:59 schrieb Mark Morgan Lloyd:
>>
>>> Is there a URL showing which Win-32 ODBC binary is considered sufficiently
>>> stable for production use?
>>>
>> The latest one on the FTP server is the recommended one.
>>
>
> Yes, but /which/ FTP server and /where/? The last one I pulled was (I think)
> when Hiroshi was still in charge, and since then as I understand it it's passed
> through at least one set of hands- plus recent discussion I see here which
> suggests that the project has forked into ODBC vs ODBCng.
>
No. There is no fork. There are two FOSS open source drivers:

1. ODBC which can be had from any of the PostgreSQL mirrors
2. ODBCng which is a brand new (not finished yet) driver for PostgreSQL.

ODBCng can be found here:

http://projects.commandprompt.com/pr.../public/odbcng

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: PLphp, PLperl - http://www.commandprompt.com/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

SEO

Production version of ODBC drivers