This is a discussion on [ psqlodbc-Bugs-1000720 ] SQLGetInfo SQL_DATABASE_NAME no info within the pgsql Interfaces odbc forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Bugs item #1000720, was opened at 2006-08-29 16:25 You can respond by visiting: http://pgfoundry.org/tracker/?func=d...oup_id=1000125 Category: None Group: None Status: ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Bugs item #1000720, was opened at 2006-08-29 16:25 You can respond by visiting: http://pgfoundry.org/tracker/?func=d...oup_id=1000125 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Farid Zidan (faridz) Assigned to: Nobody (None) Summary: SQLGetInfo SQL_DATABASE_NAME no info Initial Comment: Driver does not return database name for SQLGetInfo DATABASE_NAME // database name rc = SQLGetInfo( m_hdbc, SQL_DATABASE_NAME, m_szDatabaseName, sizeof( m_szDatabaseName ), &nLenOut ); ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Farid Zidan (faridz) Date: 2006-12-01 00:10 Message: I only need to know the name of the database for the connection. I don't need to do any cross-catalog selects, etc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Farid Zidan (faridz) Date: 2006-08-30 17:53 Message: The current database is exactly what SQL_DATABASE_NAME should return. Right now it returns nothing. MS DOC for SQL_DATABASE_NAME A character string with the name of the current database in use, if the data source defines a named object called "database". Whether the dbms supports qualifying objects by their catalog name is determined by SQL_CATALOG_USAGE which is appears to reflect the driver capability right now and is ok. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Hiroshi Inoue (hinoue) Date: 2006-08-30 17:33 Message: The driver has returned "" for the request because PostgreSQL didn't support database.schema.table notation (even schema support was unavailable until 7.3). Though PostgreSQL supports the notation in recent versions, I'm not sure if the driver is safe for the notation. PostgreSQL is essentially a catalog-less dbms. Though PostgreSQL allows the notation, the only valid database is the current one. regards, Hiroshi Inoue ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://pgfoundry.org/tracker/?func=d...oup_id=1000125 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|