Re: changed behavior in libpq odbc driver
This is a discussion on Re: changed behavior in libpq odbc driver within the pgsql Interfaces odbc forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Hi Dave, OK, I shall look into the state code problem and dead connection detection issues. :-) Regards Anoop ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
04-16-2008, 01:21 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: changed behavior in libpq odbc driver Hi Dave, OK, I shall look into the state code problem and dead connection detection issues. :-) Regards Anoop > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage@vale-housing.co.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 3:16 PM > To: Anoop Kumar; Scot Loach > Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org > Subject: RE: [ODBC] changed behavior in libpq odbc driver > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org > > [mailto  gsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Anoop Kumar> > Sent: 24 August 2005 07:17 > > To: Scot Loach > > Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org > > Subject: Re: [ODBC] changed behavior in libpq odbc driver > > > > Hi, > > > > I have committed the patch for returning SQL_NO_DATA_FOUND instead of > > SQL_SUCCESS when no rows got affected in UPDATE/DELETE. You > > may check it > > out from the CVS. > > Ahh, one less item on my todo :-) > > Do you intend to fix the state code problem and dead connection > detection issues reported by Scot as well? > > <sob story>it would really help me if you could as I've got a bunch of > other stuff to do :-( </sob story> > > :-) > > Regards, Dave. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org      |
|
04-16-2008, 01:22 AM
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: changed behavior in libpq odbc driver Hi, Anoop Kumar írta: > Hi Dave, > > OK, I shall look into the state code problem and dead connection > detection issues. :-) > > Regards > > Anoop is there any chance, guys, that you can make SQLCancel() work any time soon? Thanks, Zoltán Böszörményi >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage@vale-housing.co.uk] >>Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 3:16 PM >>To: Anoop Kumar; Scot Loach >>Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org >>Subject: RE: [ODBC] changed behavior in libpq odbc driver >> >> >> >> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org >>>[mailto gsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Anoop Kumar>>>Sent: 24 August 2005 07:17 >>>To: Scot Loach >>>Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org >>>Subject: Re: [ODBC] changed behavior in libpq odbc driver >>> >>>Hi, >>> >>>I have committed the patch for returning SQL_NO_DATA_FOUND instead > > of > >>>SQL_SUCCESS when no rows got affected in UPDATE/DELETE. You >>>may check it >>>out from the CVS. >> >>Ahh, one less item on my todo :-) >> >>Do you intend to fix the state code problem and dead connection >>detection issues reported by Scot as well? >> >><sob story>it would really help me if you could as I've got a bunch of >>other stuff to do :-( </sob story> >> >>:-) >> >>Regards, Dave. > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster |
Linear Mode
