This is a discussion on Re: Frontend/Backend protocol 3.0 within the pgsql Interfaces odbc forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> > -----Original Message----- > From: Sivakumar K [mailto:sivakumark@pervasive-postgres.com] > Sent: 07 June 2005 13:14 > To: Dave Page; pgman@candle.pha.pa.us ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| > -----Original Message----- > From: Sivakumar K [mailto:sivakumark@pervasive-postgres.com] > Sent: 07 June 2005 13:14 > To: Dave Page; pgman@candle.pha.pa.us; fuerth@sqlpower.ca > Cc: jd@commandprompt.com; pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org > Subject: RE: [ODBC] Frontend/Backend protocol 3.0 > > We too don't want to do so. However until the testing of new > libpq odbc > driver is completed, the user can have an option of using > socket code or > libpq code. > > Once the new libpq odbc driver is stable we can get rid of the socket > stuff. Past experience shows that 99.99% of users will use the precompiled binaries we put on the ftp site, and if they are marked beta they will not generally get used or tested at all (as we found with the Unicode version of the driver that I had to push to be the primary version before we saw anyone using it unless they had a very specific need). I agree that giving the option is sensible for the reason you give, however I think if anything it will reduce the testing that gets done. Regards, Dave. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|