This is a discussion on Re: Frontend/Backend protocol 3.0 within the pgsql Interfaces odbc forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto gsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Fuerth > Sent: 07 June 2005 ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto > Sent: 07 June 2005 15:39 > To: Sivakumar K > Cc: <pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org> > Subject: Re: [ODBC] Frontend/Backend protocol 3.0 > > On Jun 7, 2005, at 8:14 AM, Sivakumar K wrote: > > > We too don't want to do so. However until the testing of > new libpq odbc > > driver is completed, the user can have an option of using > socket code > > or > > libpq code. > > > > Once the new libpq odbc driver is stable we can get rid of > the socket > > stuff. > > Sounds like I wasted four good days of effort last week. > > Two questions: > > Sivakumar: Will your upcoming libpq patch include support for getting > the SQLSTATE codes from backend to the ODBC side? > > Dave: Will you commit Sivakumar's patch into the posqlodbc project? Well, I'm dealing with Anoop Kumar who was working on this (I assume Sivakumar is a colleague), but yes, following review on the list if the patch looks OK I will commit it. Regards, Dave. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly |