SEO

#1 (**permalink**) 04-16-2008, 01:27 AM

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
> Sent: 05 October 2005 18:55
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [ODBC] Just as an FYI We are up solid now on
> pgsql libpq version
>
> Seems like it's about time to consider sticking the new version into
> Fedora. I can't use a CVS pull for that, though; I have to have a
> traceable tarball. Are you planning to make a release soon?

Yes. There's only one bug that I consider a show stopper at the moment -
in declare/fetch mode, the driver fails to retrieve the second and
subsequent blocks of rows, effectively limiting the resultset size to
the cache size. Anoop and Sivakumar are working on this at the moment.

Do you have any deadlines to work to? I'm certainly hoping the fix will
be in place in plenty of time for release with pgInstaller 8.1.

Regards, Dave.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

#2 (**permalink**) 04-16-2008, 01:27 AM

"Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes:
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
>> Seems like it's about time to consider sticking the new version into
>> Fedora. I can't use a CVS pull for that, though; I have to have a
>> traceable tarball. Are you planning to make a release soon?

> Do you have any deadlines to work to?

Yeah, I'd like it in place before the end of October. After that,
I'd probably have to negotiate to get it into Fedora Core 5.

(I'm hoping PG 8.1 is done, or at least RC status, by the end of the
month too...)

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

SEO

Re: Just as an FYI We are up solid now on pgsql libpq version