This is a discussion on Re: QUERY : RE: Four art Names within the pgsql Interfaces odbc forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> ________________________________ From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org [mailto gsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Bazil Roshan Sent: 07 October 2005 13:10 To: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org Subject: [ODBC] ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| ________________________________ From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org [mailto Sent: 07 October 2005 13:10 To: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org Subject: [ODBC] QUERY : RE: Four art Names Please Dave can you provide more inputs on why 4 part names cannot be supported on PGSQL. Because a four pat name is formed from <DatabaseName>.<CatalogName>.<SchemaName>.<TableNa me> and as PostgreSQL doesn't have any concept of catalogs, your can't give them a name (because apps that autogenerate queries might try to use it). According to the Microsoft docs though, you can use <DatabaseName>..<SchemaName>.<TableName> (note the double dot). If any of their products don't like that though you'll need to take it up with them. Regards Dave |