SEO
vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
04-17-2008, 05:44 PM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: automake > -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Pflug [mailto  gadmin@pse-consulting.de]> Sent: 10 November 2005 11:04 > To: Dave Page > Cc: pgadmin-hackers > Subject: Re: automake > > Dave Page wrote: > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Andreas Pflug [mailto gadmin@pse-consulting.de]> >>Sent: 10 November 2005 09:39 > >>To: Dave Page > >>Cc: pgadmin-hackers > >>Subject: Re: automake > >> > >>Did that, automake works now, but Makefile will have a > >>missing separator > >>in line 377. > >> > >>automake-1.9 will claim that *.m4 is created by aclocal-1.4, but > >>aclocal-1.9 will have throw warnings and automake-1.9 will > fail then. > >>If 1.9 is needed, it should be called explicitely in bootstrap, no? > > > > > > Eh? Do you have both installed in different locations or something? > No, /usr/bin. > All versions are present, but ./bootstrap relies on > aclocal/autoconf to > point to the right versions. > > currently, aclocal-1.4 will run (without problem), but > automake-1.9 will > claim aclocal version and configure isn't created. aclocal-1.9 won't > run, many errors. Is this OK now (following an svn update)? Regards, Dave ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq      |
|
04-17-2008, 05:44 PM
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: automake Dave Page wrote: > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Andreas Pflug [mailto gadmin@pse-consulting.de]>>Sent: 10 November 2005 11:04 >>To: Dave Page >>Cc: pgadmin-hackers >>Subject: Re: automake >> >>Dave Page wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: Andreas Pflug [mailto gadmin@pse-consulting.de]>>>>Sent: 10 November 2005 09:39 >>>>To: Dave Page >>>>Cc: pgadmin-hackers >>>>Subject: Re: automake >>>> >>>>Did that, automake works now, but Makefile will have a >>>>missing separator >>>>in line 377. >>>> >>>>automake-1.9 will claim that *.m4 is created by aclocal-1.4, but >>>>aclocal-1.9 will have throw warnings and automake-1.9 will >> >>fail then. >> >>>>If 1.9 is needed, it should be called explicitely in bootstrap, no? >>> >>> >>>Eh? Do you have both installed in different locations or something? >> >>No, /usr/bin. >>All versions are present, but ./bootstrap relies on >>aclocal/autoconf to >>point to the right versions. >> >>currently, aclocal-1.4 will run (without problem), but >>automake-1.9 will >>claim aclocal version and configure isn't created. aclocal-1.9 won't >>run, many errors. > > > Is this OK now (following an svn update)? I get quite some warnings from aclocal, but after rm -r config* ac*;svn update I'm workable again. Regards, Andreas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster |
Linear Mode
