Unix Technical Forum

Re: Fedora package status for 1.6.3 and above

This is a discussion on Re: Fedora package status for 1.6.3 and above within the pgsql Interfaces Pgadmin Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Dave Page wrote: > >> ------- Original Message ------- >> From: "Florian G. Pflug" <fgp@phlo.org> >> To: Dave Page ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > PostgreSQL > pgsql Interfaces Pgadmin Hackers

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 07:46 PM
Florian G. Pflug
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Fedora package status for 1.6.3 and above

Dave Page wrote:
>
>> ------- Original Message -------
>> From: "Florian G. Pflug" <fgp@phlo.org>
>> To: Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
>> Sent: 27/03/07, 21:31:59
>> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Fedora package status for 1.6.3 and above
>>
>> Maybe we could build a generic statically linked binary (for i386 at least)
>> , for those distributions which nobody does up-to-date builds for?
>>
>> If there is interest in this, I could try to build such a package for
>> 1.6.3 in the next few days. Dunno how hard it is to build a version
>> that runs on the majority of the distributions out there though..

>
> I'm keen to see this work for other reasons. Would be pleased to see you work
> on it (and can help if need be).


What would a sensible version of libc be to require? I've installed
debian woody into a chroot, but noticed that the newest gcc it includes
is 3.0 - which is pretty acient, and might cause trouble with wx
or pgadmin.

OTOH, debian sarge contains libc 2.3, not 2.2 like woody. I'm not sure
how many peopel still run distros without libc 2.3...

Any ideas? Do you guys think that compiling wx+pgadmin3 with gcc 3.0 will work?

greetings, Florian Pflug


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-17-2008, 07:46 PM
Dave Page
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Fedora package status for 1.6.3 and above

Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
> What would a sensible version of libc be to require? I've installed
> debian woody into a chroot, but noticed that the newest gcc it includes
> is 3.0 - which is pretty acient, and might cause trouble with wx
> or pgadmin.
>
> OTOH, debian sarge contains libc 2.3, not 2.2 like woody. I'm not sure
> how many peopel still run distros without libc 2.3...
>
> Any ideas? Do you guys think that compiling wx+pgadmin3 with gcc 3.0
> will work?


No idea - we use 3.4.2 iirc on developer.pgadmin.org, so 3.x is
definitely feasible. Easiest way is to just give it a go!

Regards, Dave.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com