This is a discussion on Re: Patch: Query favourites within the pgsql Interfaces Pgadmin Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> > -----Original Message----- > From: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto gadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of > Magnus Hagander > Sent: 29 January ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| > -----Original Message----- > From: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto > Magnus Hagander > Sent: 29 January 2006 20:56 > To: Andreas Pflug > Cc: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Patch: Query favourites > > On this we clearly disagree (on the value of the feature, > that is). But > that's your choice, of course. I'll keep running with it myself until > such a time as an alternative exists. > Let's, as they say, agree to disagree on it. FWIW, I do think this would be a nice feature, and would tie in nicely with an idea I've been mulling over of having a centralised library site for SQL snippets. However, I did just download wxxml2 to give it a go and instantly ran into problems building it on Windows. I'm sure I could get over them with a little effort, but a little effort for me to build probably means a lot more effort helping others in the future :-( How much work would it be to use libxml2/msxml - assuming you are *definitely* going to be working on some XML import/export features that we agree would be accepted in principle? Regards, Dave. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly |
| ||||
| Dave Page wrote: > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: pgadmin-hackers-owner@postgresql.org >>[mailto >>Magnus Hagander >>Sent: 29 January 2006 20:56 >>To: Andreas Pflug >>Cc: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org >>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Patch: Query favourites >> >>On this we clearly disagree (on the value of the feature, >>that is). But >>that's your choice, of course. I'll keep running with it myself until >>such a time as an alternative exists. >>Let's, as they say, agree to disagree on it. > > > FWIW, I do think this would be a nice feature, and would tie in nicely > with an idea I've been mulling over of having a centralised library site > for SQL snippets. As we now have a postgres database, this should be the central repository for stuff like this. No need for XML here... Regards, Andreas ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org |