This is a discussion on PL/pgSQL: FOT Loops vs Cursors within the pgsql Novice forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> After reading the manual (8.0: pages 582, 584). I am not certain what real advantage there is to using ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| After reading the manual (8.0: pages 582, 584). I am not certain what real advantage there is to using a cursor over using a FOR loop, since FOR automatically uses a cursor anyway. They both avoid memory problems. Have I missed something or are there other reasons? ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings |
| ||||
| See page 587. Cursors can be referenced by other functions and be created semi-dynamically. On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 01:53:42PM -0500, Van Ingen, Lane wrote: > After reading the manual (8.0: pages 582, 584). I am not certain what real advantage there is to using a cursor over using a FOR loop, since FOR automatically uses a cursor anyway. They both avoid memory problems. Have I missed something or are there other reasons? > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) |