I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
not sure what the problem is?

Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Simon Riggs wrote:
> I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
> now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
> not sure what the problem is?
>
> Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
> Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00

Did you by any chance send it in .tar.gz format or such? Or was it
plaintext?

//Magnus

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match

On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 03:08:08PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 19:40 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
> > > now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
> > > not sure what the problem is?
> > >
> > > Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
> > > Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00
> >
> > Did you by any chance send it in .tar.gz format or such? Or was it
> > plaintext?
>
> Plaintext patch, plus two plaintext .c files.

Then I have no clue. If you can, get your mailserver logs (including the
remote queue id) and send it to Marc, hopefully he can find out where they
went.

//Magnus

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 19:40 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
> > now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
> > not sure what the problem is?
> >
> > Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
> > Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00
>
> Did you by any chance send it in .tar.gz format or such? Or was it
> plaintext?

Plaintext patch, plus two plaintext .c files.

--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Simon Riggs wrote:
> I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
> now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
> not sure what the problem is?
>
> Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
> Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00

What an obvious ploy to get more time for development. ;-)

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match

"Magnus Hagander" <magnus@hagander.net> writes:

>> Plaintext patch, plus two plaintext .c files.
>
> Then I have no clue.

Actually I've had more success with .tar.gz than plain text attachments.


--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
>> now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
>> not sure what the problem is?
>>
>> Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
>> Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00
>
> What an obvious ploy to get more time for development. ;-)

In a bid to stave off such accusations, Simon had a couple of us witness
the outgoing mail in his Sent Items folder. We can arrange for copies of
our notarized statements to be provided if necessary :-p

/D


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match

Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> "Magnus Hagander" <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>>> Plaintext patch, plus two plaintext .c files.
>>
>> Then I have no clue.

> Actually I've had more success with .tar.gz than plain text attachments.

I think the filter is not on the name or actual contents of the file,
but what MIME content-type it's labeled with. (Which is actually pretty
sensible, because the point is to reject anything that Microsloth mail
readers might try to auto-execute.)

Plain ol' application/octet-stream always gets through for me.

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Dave Page wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> >> I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
> >> now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
> >> not sure what the problem is?
> >>
> >> Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
> >> Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00
> >
> > What an obvious ploy to get more time for development. ;-)
>
> In a bid to stave off such accusations, Simon had a couple of us witness
> the outgoing mail in his Sent Items folder. We can arrange for copies of
> our notarized statements to be provided if necessary :-p

Well, FAST posted emails dated April 4 a few days ago, proving email
dates are not a valid method of authenticating the "sent" date. Perhaps
FAST's post-dated emails were meant to throw us off of Simon's pre-dating
them. ;-)

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at

http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Simon Riggs wrote:
>>>> I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
>>>> now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
>>>> not sure what the problem is?
>>>>
>>>> Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
>>>> Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00
>>> What an obvious ploy to get more time for development. ;-)
>> In a bid to stave off such accusations, Simon had a couple of us witness
>> the outgoing mail in his Sent Items folder. We can arrange for copies of
>> our notarized statements to be provided if necessary :-p
>
> Well, FAST posted emails dated April 4 a few days ago, proving email
> dates are not a valid method of authenticating the "sent" date. Perhaps
> FAST's post-dated emails were meant to throw us off of Simon's pre-dating
> them. ;-)
>

Darn, busted! After all that lobbying for a short release cycle we had
to conspire with FAST to extend it again ;-)

/D

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at

http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate