vBulletin Search Engine Optimization
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I have been working with plpython for several months and have been hampered by the lack of a traceback being logged when a plpython function raises an error. I have written a patch causes the PLy_traceback function to fully log the traceback. The output looks just like the traceback output provided by the python interpreter. Feedback appreciated. Scott --- plpython-1.70.c.orig 2006-02-06 14:24:42.000000000 -0600 +++ plpython-1.70.c.patched 2006-02-06 15:34:05.000000000 -0600 @@ -2499,7 +2499,8 @@ *vob = NULL; char *vstr, *estr, - *xstr = NULL; + *xstr = NULL, + *tbstr; /* * get the current exception @@ -2523,6 +2524,82 @@ else vstr = "Unknown"; + /* If there is a traceback object, we build a string containing + the traceback information. */ + if (tb != NULL) + { + PyObject + *cur_tb, /* traceback (tb) item being handled */ + *old_tb, /* holds tb so we can decrement reference to it */ + *hdr, /* First line of logged output */ + *tmpl, /* PyString template for the logged tb item */ + *ftr, /* Last line of logged output */ + *tb_list, /* Each tb item create a PyString in this list */ + *ln, /* The line number of the item in the traceback */ + *frame, /* the tb_frame */ + *code, /* the f_code this guy has filename and method name*/ + *fn, /* the filename of the item in the tb */ + *nm, /* the function/method name of the item in the tb */ + *args, /* A tuple of the form (fn, ln, nm) */ + *logline, /* The assembled string with the logged message */ + *os, /* points to the os module */ + *sep, /* line separator */ + *tb_log; /* PyString with the assembled log msg */ + + hdr = PyString_FromString("Traceback (most recent call last):"); + tmpl = PyString_FromString(" File \"%s\", line %s, in %s"); + ftr = PyString_FromString(""); + + tb_list = PyList_New(0); /* create the list of strings */ + PyList_Append(tb_list, hdr); /* Append the header to the list */ + + /* 1st tb is useless; throw it away */ + cur_tb = PyObject_GetAttrString(tb, "tb_next"); + while (cur_tb != Py_None) + { + + ln = PyObject_GetAttrString(cur_tb, "tb_lineno"); + frame = PyObject_GetAttrString(cur_tb, "tb_frame"); + code = PyObject_GetAttrString(frame, "f_code"); + fn = PyObject_GetAttrString(code, "co_filename"); + nm = PyObject_GetAttrString(code, "co_name"); + + args = Py_BuildValue("(OOO)", fn, ln, nm); /* args tuple */ + logline = PyString_Format(tmpl, args); /* build logged string */ + PyList_Append(tb_list, logline); /* append string to list */ + + /* decrement references on all our objects */ + Py_DECREF(logline); + Py_DECREF(args); + Py_XDECREF(nm); + Py_XDECREF(fn); + Py_XDECREF(code); + Py_XDECREF(frame); + Py_XDECREF(ln); + + old_tb = cur_tb; + /* get the next traceback item */ + cur_tb = PyObject_GetAttrString(cur_tb, "tb_next"); + Py_DECREF(old_tb); /* we're done with old_tb so decref it */ + } + PyList_Append(tb_list, ftr); /* append the log msg footer */ + + os = PyImport_ImportModule("os"); + sep = PyObject_GetAttrString(os, "linesep"); /* get os EOL char */ + tb_log = _PyString_Join(sep, tb_list); /* create tb log msgs */ + tbstr = PyString_AsString(tb_log); + + Py_DECREF(tb_log); + Py_DECREF(sep); + Py_DECREF(os); + Py_DECREF(tb_list); + Py_DECREF(ftr); + Py_DECREF(tmpl); + Py_DECREF(hdr); + } + else + tbstr = "No Traceback"; + /* * I'm not sure what to do if eob is NULL here -- we can't call PLy_elog * because that function calls us, so we could end up with infinite @@ -2530,7 +2607,7 @@ * Assert() be more appropriate? */ estr = eob ? PyString_AsString(eob) : "Unknown Exception"; - xstr = PLy_printf("%s: %s", estr, vstr); + xstr = PLy_printf("%s%s: %s", tbstr, estr, vstr); Py_DECREF(eob); Py_XDECREF(vob); ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly |
| |||
| On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 16:05 -0600, P. Scott DeVos wrote: > I have been working with plpython for several months and have > been hampered by the lack of a traceback being logged when a > plpython function raises an error. I have written a patch causes > the PLy_traceback function to fully log the traceback. The > output looks just like the traceback output provided by the > python interpreter. Can any PL/Python folks comment on whether they want this patch? > Feedback appreciated. Context diffs are preferred. Also, diffs should be against the root of the source tree, and attached as MIME attachements if possible (it seems the mailing list software munges the patch somewhat otherwise). > + hdr = PyString_FromString("Traceback (most recent call last):"); > + tmpl = PyString_FromString(" File \"%s\", line %s, in %s"); > + ftr = PyString_FromString(""); > + > + tb_list = PyList_New(0); /* create the list of strings */ > + PyList_Append(tb_list, hdr); /* Append the header to the list */ Minor nit: lowercase "Append". Similarly, consistent capitalization for all the preceding comments in the block (adjacent to the variable declarations) would be nice. > estr = eob ? PyString_AsString(eob) : "Unknown Exception"; > - xstr = PLy_printf("%s: %s", estr, vstr); > + xstr = PLy_printf("%s%s: %s", tbstr, estr, vstr); tbstr points into storage owned by tb_log, but the reference to tb_log has already been released. -Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend |
| |||
| Neil, I have written a patch causes > > the PLy_traceback function to fully log the traceback. The > > output looks just like the traceback output provided by the > > python interpreter. > > Can any PL/Python folks comment on whether they want this patch? > > I am just a humble user of PL/Py, but tracebacks are very wellcome. Not qualified to judge it's code quality I am. Harald -- GHUM Harald Massa persuadere et programmare Harald Armin Massa Reinsburgstraße 202b 70197 Stuttgart 0173/9409607 |
| |||
| On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 08:09:09PM -0500, Neil Conway wrote: > On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 16:05 -0600, P. Scott DeVos wrote: > > I have been working with plpython for several months and have > > been hampered by the lack of a traceback being logged when a > > plpython function raises an error. I have written a patch causes > > the PLy_traceback function to fully log the traceback. The > > output looks just like the traceback output provided by the > > python interpreter. > > Can any PL/Python folks comment on whether they want this patch? Yes. Absolutely. This is a required feature for any serious Python user. One of the great things about python is that almost all debugging can be done with just the excellent standard python tracebacks. Not having them is a a not only a inconvience, it signals that the implementation is incomplete in major ways and, unready for real use. -dg -- David Gould daveg@sonic.net If simplicity worked, the world would be overrun with insects. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org |
| |||
| Neil Conway wrote: > > Context diffs are preferred. Also, diffs should be against the root of > the source tree, and attached as MIME attachements if possible (it seems > the mailing list software munges the patch somewhat otherwise). > > Minor nit: lowercase "Append". Similarly, consistent capitalization for > all the preceding comments in the block (adjacent to the variable > declarations) would be nice. > > tbstr points into storage owned by tb_log, but the reference to tb_log > has already been released. > I'm on it. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org |
| |||
| P. Scott DeVos wrote: > I'm on it. Actually, don't worry about it -- I've made the corrections I had in mind myself. Attached is a revised patch. On looking closer, I didn't really like the way the patch accumulated the lines of the traceback: AFAICS _PyString_Join() is not an "official" Python C API function (it's not documented, at any rate), and besides it is cleaner and more efficient to build up the traceback string in a StringInfo rather than using Python lists and strings. The attached patch isn't quite finished: "No Traceback" when there is no traceback information doesn't seem like the best message, I need to update the regression tests and some comments, etc. But I plan to apply something similar in substance to the attached patch to HEAD in the next day or two, barring objections. -Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings |
| |||
| Neil Conway wrote: > Actually, don't worry about it -- I've made the corrections I had in > mind myself. Attached is a revised patch. On looking closer, I didn't > really like the way the patch accumulated the lines of the traceback: > AFAICS _PyString_Join() is not an "official" Python C API function (it's > not documented, at any rate), and besides it is cleaner and more > efficient to build up the traceback string in a StringInfo rather than > using Python lists and strings. > I like it. You can tell I'm a python programmer, not a C programmer. Question: Are you sure this works: "PyString_AsString(lno)"? lno is a python integer object. Maybe we want, "PyString_AsString(PyObject_Str(lno))" > The attached patch isn't quite finished: "No Traceback" when there is no > traceback information doesn't seem like the best message OK, how about "There is no traceback information" , I need to > update the regression tests and some comments, etc. But I plan to apply > something similar in substance to the attached patch to HEAD in the next > day or two, barring objections. > Thanks for your attention to this! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org |
| |||
| P. Scott DeVos wrote: > > > > Are you sure this works: "PyString_AsString(lno)"? lno is a python > integer object. Maybe we want, "PyString_AsString(PyObject_Str(lno))" > Wait, this is not the way to do it because PyObject_Str returns a new reference. I think you have to assign PyObject_Str(lno) to another variable so that you can decrement the reference on it. Unless your code works as it, in which case, never mind... Scott ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster |
| |||
| Neil, where are we on this patch? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Neil Conway wrote: > P. Scott DeVos wrote: > > I'm on it. > > Actually, don't worry about it -- I've made the corrections I had in > mind myself. Attached is a revised patch. On looking closer, I didn't > really like the way the patch accumulated the lines of the traceback: > AFAICS _PyString_Join() is not an "official" Python C API function (it's > not documented, at any rate), and besides it is cleaner and more > efficient to build up the traceback string in a StringInfo rather than > using Python lists and strings. > > The attached patch isn't quite finished: "No Traceback" when there is no > traceback information doesn't seem like the best message, I need to > update the regression tests and some comments, etc. But I plan to apply > something similar in substance to the attached patch to HEAD in the next > day or two, barring objections. > > -Neil > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings -- Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings |
| ||||
| Bruce Momjian said: > Neil, where are we on this patch? My apologies for forgetting about this -- there are a few details I need to finish off in the patch before I'd like to apply it. I'm on vacation at the moment and not really in a position to write any code, but I'll definitely be able to finish the patch when I return at the end of May. If you'd like to apply the patch sooner, anyone is welcome to finish the patch -- my recollection is that the only outstanding issues are updating the regression tests, improving some comments, and considering how this ought to generalize to other PLs. -Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster |