Unix Technical Forum

Re:

This is a discussion on Re: within the Pgsql Patches forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 01:20, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 15:17 +1100, FAST PostgreSQL wrote: ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > PostgreSQL > Pgsql Patches

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 04-18-2008, 09:38 AM
FAST PostgreSQL
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: WIP Patch - Updateable Cursors

On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 01:20, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 15:17 +1100, FAST PostgreSQL wrote:


Hi Simon,

> > We are happy to provide that. If and when it comes to the final patch
> > being accepted, we can send a copyright waiver mail which will put our
> > source code contribution under the BSD license.

>
> This approach is not practically workable and is a terrible shame.


I already made a clarification on this subject yesterday.

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql...2/msg00579.php

It is for every patch we submit. Not just the final one.

I also sent a contribution statement yesterday regarding one of my patch
which is already pending.

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql...2/msg00581.php


> What would happen if everybody said, "Well, since Fujitsu want to act
> like that, we won't grant a BSD licence on our material until they grant
> a BSD licence on theirs." Deadlock.
>
> How do we know that you'll ever give that waiver? What would stop you
> from making contributions right up to the last minute, receiving lots of
> useful feedback, then at the last minute pulling the patch, once you
> think its got no problems in it? If you do this, how will any of us fend
> off *our* corporate lawyers who would like to do the same (probably)? Or
> did you think the various companies on this list don't have any?
>
> I provided my detailed implementation thoughts on the initial proposal.
> Should I ignore posts from Fujitsu in the future because of this issue?
>
> Open source requires trust, not legal brinkmanship. If you're even
> thinking of submitting patches here, then it should already be clear
> that the people on this list are better friends to you than people from
> other companies who provide non-PostgreSQL-based services and products.
> If you don't believe that, it seems better not to post at all.
>
> I'll trust you, and hope that you'll grow to trust others back.


Of course it is. If we didn't trust the community, why would we even want to
contribute the source code in the first place.?

Rgds,
Arul Shaji


This is an email from Fujitsu Australia Software Technology Pty Ltd, ABN 27 003 693 481. It is confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to which it was addressed and may contain copyright and/or legally privileged information. No one else may read, print, store, copy or forward all or any of it or its attachments. If you receive this email in error, please return to sender. Thank you.

If you do not wish to receive commercial email messages from Fujitsu Australia Software Technology Pty Ltd, please email unsubscribe@fast.fujitsu.com.au


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com