Certainly seems that way. Missed a .diff for the rules output there...
Should be a simple replace, from what I can tell what's in the output on
the buildfarm boxes I checked is correct, the expected file shuold
changed.

Oops.

//Magnus


>
> Is this what broke the regression tests on HEAD?
>
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
> Neil Conway wrote:
>
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >> If the stats collector gets sufficiently backed up, you will lose
> >> messages. [...] Please do not try to make piecemeal
> changes in that
> >> basic design decision.
> >
> >
> > Fair enough.
> >
> > > (Actually, we could skinny it down to backend PID only ...
> >
> >> but that would add a hashtable lookup to every message
> reception in
> >> the stats collector, instead of just indexing into a
> BackendId array,
> >> so it'd probably be a net loss.)
> >
> >
> > Yeah, I agree -- backend ID and database ID isn't too bad.
> >
> > I've applied Magnus patch and bumped the catalog version.
> I'll take a
> > look at reorganizing the statistics collector so that the message
> > header is smaller shortly.
> >
> > -
>
>

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster