Patch applied. Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


Kris Jurka wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com> writes:
> >> Parts of the GSS API want the object while others want pointers to the
> >> object and it looks like this code got it backwards. I haven't tested
> >> these changes, but they look right to me.
> >
> > Wouldn't the code fail entirely if it was wrong in that way?
> >
>
> Only if it was ever run. My suspicion is that Port->gss->ctx/cred are
> never set to anything other than GSS_C_NO_CONTEXT and GSS_C_NO_CREDENTIAL.
> This patch also clarifies the checking we're doing on cleanup to be
> more clear about whether these are pointers or not.
>
> Kris Jurka
Content-Description:

[ Attachment, skipping... ]

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match